Re: [PATCH RFC x86/mce] Make mce_timed_out() identify holdout CPUs

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:08:44AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Some information is usually better than none.  And I bet that failing
> hardware is capable of all sorts of tricks at all sorts of levels.  ;-)

Tell me about it.

> Updated patch below.  Is this what you had in mind?

Ok, so I've massaged it into the below locally while taking another
detailed look. Made the pr_info pr_emerg and poked at the text more, as
I do. :)

Lemme know if something else needs to be adjusted, otherwise I'll queue
it.

Thx.

---
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Dec 23 17:04:19 2020 -0800

    x86/mce: Make mce_timed_out() identify holdout CPUs
    
    The
    
      "Timeout: Not all CPUs entered broadcast exception handler"
    
    message will appear from time to time given enough systems, but this
    message does not identify which CPUs failed to enter the broadcast
    exception handler. This information would be valuable if available,
    for example, in order to correlate with other hardware-oriented error
    messages.
    
    Add a cpumask of CPUs which maintains which CPUs have entered this
    handler, and print out which ones failed to enter in the event of a
    timeout.
    
     [ bp: Massage. ]
    
    Reported-by: Jonathan Lemon <bsd@xxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
    Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
    Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210106174102.GA23874@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
index 13d3f1cbda17..6c81d0998e0a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
@@ -877,6 +877,12 @@ static atomic_t mce_executing;
  */
 static atomic_t mce_callin;
 
+/*
+ * Track which CPUs entered the MCA broadcast synchronization and which not in
+ * order to print holdouts.
+ */
+static cpumask_t mce_missing_cpus = CPU_MASK_ALL;
+
 /*
  * Check if a timeout waiting for other CPUs happened.
  */
@@ -894,8 +900,12 @@ static int mce_timed_out(u64 *t, const char *msg)
 	if (!mca_cfg.monarch_timeout)
 		goto out;
 	if ((s64)*t < SPINUNIT) {
-		if (mca_cfg.tolerant <= 1)
+		if (mca_cfg.tolerant <= 1) {
+			if (cpumask_and(&mce_missing_cpus, cpu_online_mask, &mce_missing_cpus))
+				pr_emerg("CPUs not responding to MCE broadcast (may include false positives): %*pbl\n",
+					 cpumask_pr_args(&mce_missing_cpus));
 			mce_panic(msg, NULL, NULL);
+		}
 		cpu_missing = 1;
 		return 1;
 	}
@@ -1006,6 +1016,7 @@ static int mce_start(int *no_way_out)
 	 * is updated before mce_callin.
 	 */
 	order = atomic_inc_return(&mce_callin);
+	cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mce_missing_cpus);
 
 	/*
 	 * Wait for everyone.
@@ -1114,6 +1125,7 @@ static int mce_end(int order)
 reset:
 	atomic_set(&global_nwo, 0);
 	atomic_set(&mce_callin, 0);
+	cpumask_setall(&mce_missing_cpus);
 	barrier();
 
 	/*
@@ -2712,6 +2724,7 @@ static void mce_reset(void)
 	atomic_set(&mce_executing, 0);
 	atomic_set(&mce_callin, 0);
 	atomic_set(&global_nwo, 0);
+	cpumask_setall(&mce_missing_cpus);
 }
 
 static int fake_panic_get(void *data, u64 *val)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette