Re: [PATCH 0/7] spi: cadence-quadspi: Add Octal DTR support

[Pratyush Yadav]

Hi Mark,

On 06/01/21 02:59PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:14:18 +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > This series adds support for Octal DTR mode now that SPI NOR supports
> > these flashes. Patches 1/7 to 4/7 and 6/7 fix some minor bugs and issues.
> > Patche 5/7 lays some groundwork by implementing the supports_op() hook.
> > Patch 7/7 adds the Octal DTR mode support.
> > 
> > While the main aim of this series is to support 8D-8D-8D mode, other
> > modes like 4D-4D-4D or 2S-2S-2S should also now be supported, though
> > they have not been tested.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to
> 
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
> 
> Thanks!

:-)
 
> [1/7] spi: cadence-quadspi: Set master max_speed_hz
>       commit: 3a5c09c8d1ed9a7323f0e5c435021531f0865c16
> [2/7] spi: cadence-quadspi: Abort read if dummy cycles required are too many
>       commit: ceeda328edeeeeac7579e9dbf0610785a3b83d39
> [3/7] spi: cadence-quadspi: Set dummy cycles from STIG commands
>       commit: 888d517b992532df2b6115fbdc9620673ca7c651
> [4/7] spi: cadence-quadspi: Fix dummy cycle calculation when buswidth > 1
>       commit: 7512eaf54190e4cc9247f18439c008d44b15022c
> [5/7] spi: cadence-quadspi: Implement a simple supports_op hook
>       commit: a273596b9b50c76a9cc1f65d3eb7f8ab5c3eb3e3
> [6/7] spi: cadence-quadspi: Wait at least 500 ms for direct reads
>       commit: 0920a32cf6f20467aa133a47b776ee782daa889f

The kernel test robot reported some build warnings on this patch on 
32-bit platforms and I was planning on re-rolling it soon. Now that it 
is in your tree, I will send a follow-up patch to fix it.

> [7/7] spi: cadence-quadspi: Add DTR support
>       commit: f453f293979fb648d2e505c132887811acb6bde6
> 
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
> 
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
> 
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
> 
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments India