Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 01:24:32PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   cffdc9c7c24c ("EXP sched: Print list of runnable tasks in the current rq")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> 
> Paul, remember the rules for -next:
> 
> You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
> been:
>      * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
>         Signed-off-by,
>      * posted to the relevant mailing list,
>      * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
>      * successfully unit tested, and 
>      * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
> 
> Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
> to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

Please accept my apologies for my messing this up.

Valentin, may I apply your Signed-off-by?  Otherwise, I am liable to
again get it into -next where it is not yet ready to go.  But without it,
rcutorture gets noise from 12e08bc4d ("sched/hotplug: Consolidate task
migration on CPU unplug") that is otherwise difficult to diagnose.  :-/

							Thanx, Paul