Re: [PATCH 0/8] FPGA DFL Changes for 5.12

[Tom Rix]

On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
>> changes for FPGA DFL.
> Is there something I can do to help ?
>
> I am paid to look after linux-fpga, so i have plenty of time.
>
> Some ideas of what i am doing now privately i can do publicly.
>
> 1. keep linux-fpga sync-ed to greg's branch so linux-fpga is normally in a pullable state.
>
> 2. an in-flight dev branch for the outstanding patches 

I have setup these branches based on Greg's char-misc-next

fpga-next, which is char-misc-next base for fpga-testing

fpga-testing, all the in-flight patches that would apply with automatic merge conflict resolution

These are respectively

https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-next

https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-testing


There are two trivial changes, that could go to 5.12 now.

fpga: dfl: fme: Constify static attribute_group structs

fpga: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock

respectively

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210108235414.48017-1-rikard.falkeborn@xxxxxxxxx/

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201228135135.28788-1-zhengyongjun3@xxxxxxxxxx/


There are a couple of patchsets that conflict

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210105230855.15019-7-russell.h.weight@xxxxxxxxx/

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201203171548.1538178-3-matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Which I will follow up on.


And the xilinx patchset

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201217075046.28553-1-sonals@xxxxxxxxxx/

Which is being split/worked on offline.


If I have missed any patchset, poke me.

Tom


>
> Tom
>
>