[PATCH bpf-next] bpf: change 'BPF_ADD' to 'BPF_AND' in print_bpf_insn()

[menglong8 . dong]

From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@xxxxxxxxxx>

This 'BPF_ADD' is duplicated, and I belive it should be 'BPF_AND'.

Fixes: 981f94c3e921 ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
index 19ff8fed7f4b..3acc7e0b6916 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
 				insn->dst_reg,
 				insn->off, insn->src_reg);
 		else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
-			 (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_ADD ||
+			 (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_AND ||
 			  insn->imm == BPF_OR || insn->imm == BPF_XOR)) {
 			verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) %s r%d\n",
 				insn->code,
-- 
2.25.1