Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power

[Viresh Kumar]

On 27-01-21, 10:11, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/27/21 9:15 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 26-01-21, 10:39, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> > > As it's a RFC, it still misses the cpufreq sysfs implementation, but would
> > > be addressed if all agree.
> > 
> > Not commenting on the whole stuff but if you ever need something for cpufreq, it
> > is already there. Look for these.
> > 
> > store_one(scaling_min_freq, min);
> > store_one(scaling_max_freq, max);
> > 
> > Hopefully they will work just fine.
> > 
> 
> So, can I assume you don't mind to plumb it into these two?

No :)

As I said at the top, I am not commenting on the whole thing yet, may
need to think over a bit and Rafael will comment as well.

-- 
viresh