Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] handle large user and group ID for isofs and udf

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:55:01AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 28-01-21 15:12:27, bingjingc wrote:
> > From: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The uid/gid (unsigned int) of a domain user may be larger than INT_MAX.
> > The parse_options of isofs and udf will return 0, and mount will fail
> > with -EINVAL. These patches try to handle large user and group ID.
> > 
> > BingJing Chang (3):
> >   parser: add unsigned int parser
> >   isofs: handle large user and group ID
> >   udf: handle large user and group ID
> 
> Thanks for your patches! Just two notes:
> 
> 1) I don't think Matthew Wilcox gave you his Reviewed-by tag (at least I
> didn't see such email). Generally the rule is that the developer has to
> explicitely write in his email that you can attach his Reviewed-by tag for
> it to be valid.

Right, I didn't.

Looking at fuse, they deleted their copy of match_uint
in favour of switching to the fs_parameter_spec (commit
c30da2e981a703c6b1d49911511f7ade8dac20be) and I wonder if isofs & udf
shouldn't receive the same attention.