Re: [PATCH v2] kretprobe: avoid re-registration of the same kretprobe earlier

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Jan 28 2021 - 13:12:52 EST



Masami,

Care to review?

Thanks!

-- Steve


On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:44:27 +0800
Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Our system encountered a re-init error when re-registering same kretprobe,
> where the kretprobe_instance in rp->free_instances is illegally accessed
> after re-init.
>
> Implementation to avoid re-registration has been introduced for kprobe
> before, but lags for register_kretprobe(). We must check if kprobe has
> been re-registered before re-initializing kretprobe, otherwise it will
> destroy the data struct of kretprobe registered, which can lead to memory
> leak, system crash, also some unexpected behaviors.
>
> We use check_kprobe_rereg() to check if kprobe has been re-registered
> before running register_kretprobe()'s body, for giving a warning message
> and terminate registration process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index f7fb5d135930..5c4a884953e9 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1978,6 +1978,10 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> if (!kprobe_on_func_entry(rp->kp.addr, rp->kp.symbol_name, rp->kp.offset))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* If only rp->kp.addr is specified, check reregistering kprobes */
> + if (rp->kp.addr && check_kprobe_rereg(&rp->kp))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (kretprobe_blacklist_size) {
> addr = kprobe_addr(&rp->kp);
> if (IS_ERR(addr))