Re: [PATCH resend] e100: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API

[Nguyen, Anthony L]

On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 22:07 +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
> 
> The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has
> been
> hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag.
> It has been compile tested.
> 
> When memory is allocated in 'e100_alloc()', GFP_KERNEL can be used
> because
> it is only called from the probe function and no lock is acquired.
> 
> 
> @@
> @@
> -    PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> +    DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> 
> @@
> @@
> -    PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
> +    DMA_TO_DEVICE
> 
> @@
> @@
> -    PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> +    DMA_FROM_DEVICE
> 
> @@
> @@
> -    PCI_DMA_NONE
> +    DMA_NONE
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> -    pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> +    dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> -    pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> +    dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
> @@
> -    pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> +    dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> -    pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
> +    dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> -    pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> +    dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> -    pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> +    dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
>    https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
> 
> First sent on 18 Jul. 2020, see:
>     
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200718115546.358240-1-christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/
> It still applies cleanly with latest linux-next
> 
> Tested tag, see:
>    
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/DM6PR11MB289001E5538E536F0CB60A1FBC070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> --

My apologies, this patch slipped through the cracks for me. I will send
it in my next net-next 1GbE series or Jakub you can take it directly if
you'd like.

Thanks,
Tony