Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: Avoid calling btrfs_get_chunk_map() twice

[Michal Rostecki]

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:22:48AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On 1/27/21 8:57 AM, Michal Rostecki wrote:
> > From: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Before this change, the btrfs_get_io_geometry() function was calling
> > btrfs_get_chunk_map() to get the extent mapping, necessary for
> > calculating the I/O geometry. It was using that extent mapping only
> > internally and freeing the pointer after its execution.
> > 
> > That resulted in calling btrfs_get_chunk_map() de facto twice by the
> > __btrfs_map_block() function. It was calling btrfs_get_io_geometry()
> > first and then calling btrfs_get_chunk_map() directly to get the extent
> > mapping, used by the rest of the function.
> > 
> > This change fixes that by passing the extent mapping to the
> > btrfs_get_io_geometry() function as an argument.
> > 
> > v2:
> > When btrfs_get_chunk_map() returns an error in btrfs_submit_direct():
> > - Use errno_to_blk_status(PTR_ERR(em)) as the status
> > - Set em to NULL
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> This panic'ed all of my test vms in their overnight xfstests runs, the panic is this
> 
> [ 2449.936502] BTRFS critical (device dm-7): mapping failed logical
> 1113825280 bio len 40960 len 24576
> [ 2449.937073] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 2449.937329] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:6450!
> [ 2449.937604] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> [ 2449.937855] CPU: 0 PID: 259045 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 5.11.0-rc5+ #122
> [ 2449.938252] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
> 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
> [ 2449.938713] Workqueue: btrfs-worker-high btrfs_work_helper
> [ 2449.939016] RIP: 0010:btrfs_map_bio.cold+0x5a/0x5c
> [ 2449.939392] Code: 37 87 ff ff e8 ed d4 8a ff 48 83 c4 18 e9 b5 52 8b ff
> 49 89 c8 4c 89 fa 4c 89 f1 48 c7 c6 b0 c0 61 8b 48 89 ef e8 11 87 ff ff <0f>
> 0b 4c 89 e7 e8 42 09 86 ff e9 fd 59 8b ff 49 8b 7a 50 44 89 f2
> [ 2449.940402] RSP: 0000:ffff9f24c1637d90 EFLAGS: 00010282
> [ 2449.940689] RAX: 0000000000000057 RBX: ffff90c78ff716b8 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 2449.941080] RDX: ffff90c7fbc27ae0 RSI: ffff90c7fbc19110 RDI: ffff90c7fbc19110
> [ 2449.941467] RBP: ffff90c7911d4000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> [ 2449.941853] R10: ffff9f24c1637b48 R11: ffffffff8b9723e8 R12: 0000000000000000
> [ 2449.942243] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000000a000 R15: 000000004263a000
> [ 2449.942632] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff90c7fbc00000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 2449.943072] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 2449.943386] CR2: 00005575163c3080 CR3: 000000010ad6c004 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
> [ 2449.943772] Call Trace:
> [ 2449.943915]  ? lock_release+0x1c3/0x290
> [ 2449.944135]  run_one_async_done+0x3a/0x60
> [ 2449.944360]  btrfs_work_helper+0x136/0x520
> [ 2449.944588]  process_one_work+0x26e/0x570
> [ 2449.944812]  worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
> [ 2449.945016]  ? process_one_work+0x570/0x570
> [ 2449.945250]  kthread+0x137/0x150
> [ 2449.945430]  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
> [ 2449.945666]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> 
> it happens when you run btrfs/060.  Please make sure to run xfstests against
> patches before you submit them upstream.  Thanks,
> 
> Josef

Umm... I ran the xftests against v1 patch and didn't get that panic.
I'll try to reproduce and fix that now. Thanks for the heads up and
sorry!

Thanks,
Michal