Re: [PATCH net-next] seg6: fool-proof the processing of SRv6 behavior attributes

[David Ahern]

On 2/3/21 7:27 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> 
> I think there is an issue here because BITS_PER_TYPE(unsigned long) is greater
> than the SEG6_LOCAL_MAX (currently = 9).
> 
> I think it should be like this:
> 
>  BUILD_BUG_ON(SEG6_LOCAL_MAX + 1 > BITS_PER_TYPE(unsigned long))
> 
> I will send a v2 with the changes discussed so far.

yes, I had that backwards.