Re: [PATCH] devfreq: rk3399_dmc: Simplify with dev_err_probe()

From: Chanwoo Choi
Date: Sun Feb 28 2021 - 02:02:35 EST


On 21. 2. 28. 오전 1:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 15:10, Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 12:31 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with
dev_err_probe(). Less code and the error value gets printed.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 20 ++++++--------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
index 027769e39f9b..35b3542f1f7b 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
@@ -324,22 +324,14 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mutex_init(&data->lock);

data->vdd_center = devm_regulator_get(dev, "center");
- if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_center)) {
- if (PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- return -EPROBE_DEFER;
-
- dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the regulator \"center\"\n");
- return PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center);
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_center))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center),
+ "Cannot get the regulator \"center\"\n");

data->dmc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "dmc_clk");
- if (IS_ERR(data->dmc_clk)) {
- if (PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- return -EPROBE_DEFER;
-
- dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the clk dmc_clk\n");
- return PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk);
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(data->dmc_clk))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk),
+ "Cannot get the clk dmc_clk\n");

data->edev = devfreq_event_get_edev_by_phandle(dev, 0);
if (IS_ERR(data->edev))
--
2.17.1


Applied it. Thanks.

Hi Chanwoo,

Do you know what happened with this patch? You replied that it is
applied but I cannot find it in the Linus' or next trees.


Hi Krzysztof,

There was some my mistake. I'm sorry.
I applied it again to next branch.

--
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi