Re: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: Fix task util_est update filtering

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Mar 01 2021 - 16:47:32 EST


On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:34:09PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 26/02/2021 09:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 04:58:20PM +0000, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> >> +#define UTIL_EST_MARGIN (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / 100)
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> - * Check if a (signed) value is within a specified (unsigned) margin,
> >> + * Check if a (signed) value is within the (unsigned) util_est margin,
> >> * based on the observation that:
> >> *
> >> * abs(x) < y := (unsigned)(x + y - 1) < (2 * y - 1)
> >> *
> >> - * NOTE: this only works when value + maring < INT_MAX.
> >> + * NOTE: this only works when value + UTIL_EST_MARGIN < INT_MAX.
> >> */
> >> -static inline bool within_margin(int value, int margin)
> >> +static inline bool util_est_within_margin(int value)
> >> {
> >> - return ((unsigned int)(value + margin - 1) < (2 * margin - 1));
> >> + return ((unsigned int)(value + UTIL_EST_MARGIN - 1) <
> >> + (2 * UTIL_EST_MARGIN - 1));
> >> }
> >
> >> - if (within_margin(last_ewma_diff, (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / 100)))
> >> + if (util_est_within_margin(last_ewma_diff)) {
> >
> > What was the purpose of this change? What was a generic helper is now
> > super specific.
>
> I guess because it was only ever used in util_est for last_ewma_diff.
>
> It's now used for last_ewma_diff and last_enqueued_diff, still only for
> util_est though and both times with the same margin
> (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / 100)).
>
> Vincent D. should be back on Wed from hols.

Fair enough; I've un-done it but kept the rest of the patch.