[PATCH 5.10 566/663] media: smipcie: fix interrupt handling and IR timeout

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Mar 01 2021 - 23:15:02 EST


From: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx>

commit 6532923237b427ed30cc7b4486f6f1ccdee3c647 upstream.

After the first IR message, interrupts are no longer received. In addition,
the code generates a timeout IR message of 10ms but sets the timeout value
to 100ms, so no timeout was ever generated.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204317

Fixes: a49a7a4635de ("media: smipcie: add universal ir capability")
Tested-by: Laz Lev <lazlev@xxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.1+
Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/pci/smipcie/smipcie-ir.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/media/pci/smipcie/smipcie-ir.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/smipcie/smipcie-ir.c
@@ -60,38 +60,44 @@ static void smi_ir_decode(struct smi_rc
{
struct smi_dev *dev = ir->dev;
struct rc_dev *rc_dev = ir->rc_dev;
- u32 dwIRControl, dwIRData;
- u8 index, ucIRCount, readLoop;
+ u32 control, data;
+ u8 index, ir_count, read_loop;

- dwIRControl = smi_read(IR_Init_Reg);
+ control = smi_read(IR_Init_Reg);

- if (dwIRControl & rbIRVld) {
- ucIRCount = (u8) smi_read(IR_Data_Cnt);
+ dev_dbg(&rc_dev->dev, "ircontrol: 0x%08x\n", control);

- readLoop = ucIRCount/4;
- if (ucIRCount % 4)
- readLoop += 1;
- for (index = 0; index < readLoop; index++) {
- dwIRData = smi_read(IR_DATA_BUFFER_BASE + (index * 4));
-
- ir->irData[index*4 + 0] = (u8)(dwIRData);
- ir->irData[index*4 + 1] = (u8)(dwIRData >> 8);
- ir->irData[index*4 + 2] = (u8)(dwIRData >> 16);
- ir->irData[index*4 + 3] = (u8)(dwIRData >> 24);
+ if (control & rbIRVld) {
+ ir_count = (u8)smi_read(IR_Data_Cnt);
+
+ dev_dbg(&rc_dev->dev, "ircount %d\n", ir_count);
+
+ read_loop = ir_count / 4;
+ if (ir_count % 4)
+ read_loop += 1;
+ for (index = 0; index < read_loop; index++) {
+ data = smi_read(IR_DATA_BUFFER_BASE + (index * 4));
+ dev_dbg(&rc_dev->dev, "IRData 0x%08x\n", data);
+
+ ir->irData[index * 4 + 0] = (u8)(data);
+ ir->irData[index * 4 + 1] = (u8)(data >> 8);
+ ir->irData[index * 4 + 2] = (u8)(data >> 16);
+ ir->irData[index * 4 + 3] = (u8)(data >> 24);
}
- smi_raw_process(rc_dev, ir->irData, ucIRCount);
- smi_set(IR_Init_Reg, rbIRVld);
+ smi_raw_process(rc_dev, ir->irData, ir_count);
}

- if (dwIRControl & rbIRhighidle) {
+ if (control & rbIRhighidle) {
struct ir_raw_event rawir = {};

+ dev_dbg(&rc_dev->dev, "high idle\n");
+
rawir.pulse = 0;
rawir.duration = SMI_SAMPLE_PERIOD * SMI_SAMPLE_IDLEMIN;
ir_raw_event_store_with_filter(rc_dev, &rawir);
- smi_set(IR_Init_Reg, rbIRhighidle);
}

+ smi_set(IR_Init_Reg, rbIRVld);
ir_raw_event_handle(rc_dev);
}

@@ -150,7 +156,7 @@ int smi_ir_init(struct smi_dev *dev)
rc_dev->dev.parent = &dev->pci_dev->dev;

rc_dev->map_name = dev->info->rc_map;
- rc_dev->timeout = MS_TO_US(100);
+ rc_dev->timeout = SMI_SAMPLE_PERIOD * SMI_SAMPLE_IDLEMIN;
rc_dev->rx_resolution = SMI_SAMPLE_PERIOD;

ir->rc_dev = rc_dev;
@@ -173,7 +179,7 @@ void smi_ir_exit(struct smi_dev *dev)
struct smi_rc *ir = &dev->ir;
struct rc_dev *rc_dev = ir->rc_dev;

- smi_ir_stop(ir);
rc_unregister_device(rc_dev);
+ smi_ir_stop(ir);
ir->rc_dev = NULL;
}