Re: [PATCH 5.10 491/663] USB: serial: option: update interface mapping for ZTE P685M

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu Mar 04 2021 - 08:28:19 EST


On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:58:19AM +0100, Lech Perczak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-03-01 at 17:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit 6420a569504e212d618d4a4736e2c59ed80a8478 upstream.
> >
> > This patch prepares for qmi_wwan driver support for the device.
> > Previously "option" driver mapped itself to interfaces 0 and 3 (matching
> > ff/ff/ff), while interface 3 is in fact a QMI port.
> > Interfaces 1 and 2 (matching ff/00/00) expose AT commands,
> > and weren't supported previously at all.
> > Without this patch, a possible conflict would exist if device ID was
> > added to qmi_wwan driver for interface 3.
> >
> > Update and simplify device ID to match interfaces 0-2 directly,
> > to expose QCDM (0), PCUI (1), and modem (2) ports and avoid conflict
> > with QMI (3), and ADB (4).
> >
> > The modem is used inside ZTE MF283+ router and carriers identify it as
> > such.
> > Interface mapping is:
> > 0: QCDM, 1: AT (PCUI), 2: AT (Modem), 3: QMI, 4: ADB
> >
> > T: Bus=02 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=05 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
> > D: Ver= 2.01 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
> > P: Vendor=19d2 ProdID=1275 Rev=f0.00
> > S: Manufacturer=ZTE,Incorporated
> > S: Product=ZTE Technologies MSM
> > S: SerialNumber=P685M510ZTED0000CP&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&0
> > C:* #Ifs= 5 Cfg#= 1 Atr=a0 MxPwr=500mA
> > I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=option
> > E: Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> > E: Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> > I:* If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=option
> > E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 10 Ivl=32ms
> > E: Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> > E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> > I:* If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=option
> > E: Ad=85(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 10 Ivl=32ms
> > E: Ad=84(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> > E: Ad=03(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> > I:* If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=qmi_wwan
> > E: Ad=87(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 8 Ivl=32ms
> > E: Ad=86(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> > E: Ad=04(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> > I:* If#= 4 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=42 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
> > E: Ad=88(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> > E: Ad=05(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >
> > Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210207005443.12936-1-lech.perczak@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
> > @@ -1569,7 +1569,8 @@ static const struct usb_device_id option
> > { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1272, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
> > { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1273, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
> > { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1274, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
> > - { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1275, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
> > + { USB_DEVICE(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1275), /* ZTE P685M */
> > + .driver_info = RSVD(3) | RSVD(4) },
> > { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1276, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
> > { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1277, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
> > { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(ZTE_VENDOR_ID, 0x1278, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) },
> >
> >
> If this patch is selected, then 88eee9b7b42e69fb622ddb3ff6f37e8e4347f5b2
> ("net: usb: qmi_wwan: support ZTE P685M modem")
> probably should be selected, too. This patch frees up an interface to be
> claimed by qmi_wwan driver by the mentioned patch.
> The mentioned patch only adds a device ID to qmi_wwan driver.
>
> In my opinion, those two should come in pair. Regarding version, I think
> that backporting to 5.4.y and later is enough, as OpenWrt,
> from which those patches originate is currently on 5.4.y on the target
> requiring it, and will move to 5.10.y soon.
> Backporting this would certainly make OpenWrt folks happy, however I don't
> insist on it.

Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h