Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] iio/scmi: Adding support for IIO SCMI Based Sensors

[Sudeep Holla]

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 07:48:41PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 04:28:42 +0000
> Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:30:37AM -0800, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the detailed and careful review of this patch. Good to hear
> > > that v7 is not required.   Please find below answers to your
> > > questions. Looking forward to seeing this patch merged in the next
> > > cycle. Thanks for your help in making this happen.
> > >
> >
> > Any update on this ? Please share the branch with is patch so that I
> > can pull and ask Cristian to make his changes on top.
> Running a bit behind at the moment.
>

No worries.

> Anyhow, there should now be an ib-iio-scmi-5.12-rc1 branch
> on https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git
>

Thanks

> Includes making the various long long local variables explicitly
> s64 and u64 as relevant.
>
> Based on the rc1 that eats babies so handle with care :)
>

😁 

> I've also merge this into the togreg branch of iio.git.
> As explained above that wasn't entirely trivial so Jyoti
> please take a quick look and check that changes are fine.
> Pushed out as testing to let the autobuilders poke at it.
> Assuming they don't find anything, it should be fine
> for Sudeep to merge that ib and everything will unwind
> nicely in Linus' tree next cycle.
>

Hope so.

> There is a bit of an ongoing discussion of an earlier patch
> in the IIO tree, so I might end up redoing this merge
> if I need to rebase to sort that out, but I'll make sure
> the diff is the same (git ID might change).
>

I can wait for a week or 2 if you think things will settle down by then.
We can avoid 2 different git IDs if possible. The main intention was to
give some reference to Cristian to rebase/post his series. I am all
fine to wait for a week or 2 for final branch.

--
Regards,
Sudeep