Re: [EXT] [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: spi: add compatible entry for imx8mp in FlexSPI controller

From: Heiko Schocher
Date: Tue Mar 09 2021 - 01:45:36 EST


Hello Kuldeep,

On 09.03.21 07:29, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 09.03.21 06:56, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
>>> Hi Heiko,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Heiko Schocher <hs@xxxxxxx>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:01 AM
>>>> To: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@xxxxxxx>; Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@xxxxxxx>;
>>>> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>>>> Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@xxxxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>> linux- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: spi: add compatible entry
>>>> for imx8mp in FlexSPI controller
>>>>
>>>> Caution: EXT Email
>>>>
>>>> add compatible entry "nxp,imx8mp-fspi" in NXP FlexSPI controller
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@xxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> (no changes since v1)
>>>>
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
>>>> index 7ac60d9fe3571..fd5f081f6d91b 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
>>>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Required properties:
>>>> - compatible : Should be "nxp,lx2160a-fspi"
>>>> "nxp,imx8qxp-fspi"
>>>> "nxp,imx8mm-fspi"
>>>> + "nxp,imx8mp-fspi"
>>>
>>> It seems the changes are not on top of tree. Please see[1] for latest changes
>> including imx8dxl entry.
>>> Snippet below:
>>>
>>> Required properties:
>>> - compatible : Should be "nxp,lx2160a-fspi"
>>> "nxp,imx8qxp-fspi"
>>> "nxp,imx8mm-fspi"
>>> "nxp,imx8dxl-fspi"
>>
>> My patches are based on mainline..
>> * 144c79ef33536 - (origin/master, origin/HEAD) Merge tag 'perf-tools-fixes-for-
>> v5.12-2020-03-07'
>> of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux (vor 32 Stunden)
>> <Linus Torvalds>
>>
>> Should I post this patch rebased on [1] or may all patches rebased on [1] ?
>
> Hi Heiko,
>
> As per cover letter, I can identify that first two are driver/Documentation patches and other two are device-tree patches.
> Device-tree patches(3/4 and 4/4) will go via Shawn tree (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git)
> And initial two driver patches(1/4 and 2/4) will go via Mark's tree (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git)
>
> One approach I can think of is to send driver patches first and later send device-tree patches mentioning dependency on first two patches.

Yep, seems a good approach to me.

> Maybe Mark can comment here if he has any other opinion.

Yep, will wait for more comments, and if all is fine with this
patchset, I can split it into 2 series.

Thanks!

bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-52 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: hs@xxxxxxx