Re: [PATCH 4/6] usbip: fix stub_dev usbip_sockfd_store() races leading to gpf

[Shuah Khan]

On 3/9/21 4:40 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2021/03/10 4:50, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 3/9/21 4:04 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > On 2021/03/09 1:27, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > > Yes. We might need synchronization between events, threads, and shutdown
> > > > in usbip_host side and in connection polling and threads in vhci.
> > > >
> > > > I am also looking at the shutdown sequences closely as well since the
> > > > local state is referenced without usbip_device lock in these paths.
> > > >
> > > > I am approaching these problems as peeling the onion an expression so
> > > > we can limit the changes and take a spot fix approach. We have the
> > > > goal to address these crashes and not introduce regressions.
> > >
> > > I think my [PATCH v4 01/12]-[PATCH v4 06/12] simplify your further changes
> > > without introducing regressions. While ud->lock is held when checking ud->status,
> > > current attach/detach code is racy about read/update of ud->status . I think we
> > > can close race in attach/detach code via a simple usbip_event_mutex serialization.
> >
> > Do you mean patches 1,2,3,3,4,5,6?
>
> Yes, my 1,2,3,4,5,6.
>
> Since you think that usbip_prepare_threads() does not worth introducing, I'm fine with
> replacing my 7,8,9,10,11,12 with your "[PATCH 0/6] usbip fixes to crashes found by syzbot".

Using event lock isn't the right approach to solve the race. It is a
large grain lock. I am not looking to replace patches.

I still haven't seen any response from you about if you were able to
verify the fixes I sent in fix the problem you are seeing.

thanks,
-- Shuah