Re: The killing of ideal_nops[]

[hpa]

On March 9, 2021 1:24:44 PM PST, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:05:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:58:17 +0100
>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > AFAICT everything made in the past 10 years ends up using p6_nops.
>Is it
>> > time to kill off ideal_nops[] and simplify life?
>> > 
>> 
>> Well, the one bug that was reported recently was due to a box that
>uses a
>> different "ideal_nops" than p6_nops. Perhaps we should ask him if
>there's
>> any noticeable difference between using p6_nops for every function
>than the
>> ideal_nops that as found for that box.
>
>If the machine is more than a decade old, I'm not really caring about
>optimal performance. If it is 32bit, I really couldn't be arsed as long
>as it boots.

p6_nops don't boot on all 32-bit chips.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.