Re: [PATCH] dlm: Mundane typo fixes throughout the file lock.c

[Randy Dunlap]

On 3/15/21 10:27 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> 
> Trivial typo fixes throughout the file.
> 
> cc: trivial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


> ---
>  fs/dlm/lock.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
> index 002123efc6b0..caadc426c8b4 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void del_timeout(struct dlm_lkb *lkb);
>  static void toss_rsb(struct kref *kref);
> 
>  /*
> - * Lock compatibilty matrix - thanks Steve
> + * Lock compatibility matrix - thanks Steve
>   * UN = Unlocked state. Not really a state, used as a flag
>   * PD = Padding. Used to make the matrix a nice power of two in size
>   * Other states are the same as the VMS DLM.
> @@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ static int _remove_from_waiters(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype,
>  		return -1;
>  	}
> 
> -	/* Remove for the convert reply, and premptively remove for the
> +	/* Remove for the convert reply, and preemptively remove for the
>  	   cancel reply.  A convert has been granted while there's still
>  	   an outstanding cancel on it (the cancel is moot and the result
>  	   in the cancel reply should be 0).  We preempt the cancel reply
> @@ -2357,14 +2357,14 @@ static int _can_be_granted(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int now,
>  	 * 6-5: But the default algorithm for deciding whether to grant or
>  	 * queue conversion requests does not by itself guarantee that such
>  	 * requests are serviced on a "first come first serve" basis.  This, in
> -	 * turn, can lead to a phenomenon known as "indefinate postponement".
> +	 * turn, can lead to a phenomenon known as "indefinite postponement".
>  	 *
>  	 * 6-7: This issue is dealt with by using the optional QUECVT flag with
>  	 * the system service employed to request a lock conversion.  This flag
>  	 * forces certain conversion requests to be queued, even if they are
>  	 * compatible with the granted modes of other locks on the same
>  	 * resource.  Thus, the use of this flag results in conversion requests
> -	 * being ordered on a "first come first servce" basis.
> +	 * being ordered on a "first come first serve" basis.
>  	 *
>  	 * DCT: This condition is all about new conversions being able to occur
>  	 * "in place" while the lock remains on the granted queue (assuming
> --


-- 
~Randy