Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed Mar 17 2021 - 21:53:56 EST


Hi all,

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:08:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 92f1d09ca4ed ("drm: Switch to %p4cc format modifier")
>
> from the drm tree and commit:
>
> 46d12f911821 ("drm/i915: migrate skl planes code new file (v5)")
>
> from the drm-intel tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the latter version of the file and applied the
> following patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
> as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
> be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:05:42 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] merge fix for "drm: Switch to %p4cc format modifier"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> index 1f335cb09149..45ceff436bf7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> @@ -1120,7 +1120,6 @@ static int skl_plane_check_fb(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
> unsigned int rotation = plane_state->hw.rotation;
> - struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
>
> if (!fb)
> return 0;
> @@ -1168,9 +1167,8 @@ static int skl_plane_check_fb(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> case DRM_FORMAT_XVYU12_16161616:
> case DRM_FORMAT_XVYU16161616:
> drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> - "Unsupported pixel format %s for 90/270!\n",
> - drm_get_format_name(fb->format->format,
> - &format_name));
> + "Unsupported pixel format %p4cc for 90/270!\n",
> + &fb->format->format);
> return -EINVAL;
> default:
> break;
> --
> 2.30.0

The above fix up patch now needs to be applied to the drm tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpgc86gtOc9V.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature