RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 06/11] i2c: imx-lpi2c: improve i2c driver probe priority

[Clark Wang]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 13:39
> To: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx;
> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx;
> christian.koenig@xxxxxxx; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 06/11] i2c: imx-lpi2c: improve i2c driver probe
> priority
> 
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:53:54PM +0800, Clark Wang wrote:
> > From: Gao Pan <pandy.gao@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > use subsys_initcall for i2c driver to improve i2c driver probe
> > priority
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gao Pan <pandy.gao@xxxxxxx>
> 
> I usually don't take subsys_initcall patches anymore. In most cases, the
client
> drivers can be fixed instead. If this is not the case for you, you need to
state
> that explicitly in the commit message.

Okay. Because it is an old patch, I will check if it is necessary. If no,
I will continue to use module_platform_driver(lpi2c_imx_driver);
Thanks.

Best Regards,
Clark Wang

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature