Re: [PATCH][next] loop: Fix missing max_active argument in alloc_workqueue call

[Dan Schatzberg]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:12:10PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/18/21 9:16 AM, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The 3rd argument to alloc_workqueue should be the max_active count,
> > however currently it is the lo->lo_number that is intended for the
> > loop%d number. Fix this by adding in the missing max_active count.
> 
> Dan, please fold this (or something similar) in when you're redoing the
> series.
> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 

Will do.