Re: [PATCH 06/19] drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs: Move some large variables from the stack to the heap

From: Alex Deucher
Date: Fri Mar 19 2021 - 14:32:30 EST


On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:26 PM Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-19 2:13 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote:
> > + Harry, Nick
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 4:24 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> >>
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c: In function ‘calculate_bandwidth’:
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c:2016:1: warning: the frame size of 1216 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> >>
> >> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@xxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---
> >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c
> >> index e633f8a51edb6..9d8f2505a61c2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c
> >> @@ -98,16 +98,16 @@ static void calculate_bandwidth(
> >> int32_t num_cursor_lines;
> >>
> >> int32_t i, j, k;
> >> - struct bw_fixed yclk[3];
> >> - struct bw_fixed sclk[8];
> >> + struct bw_fixed *yclk;
> >> + struct bw_fixed *sclk;
> >> bool d0_underlay_enable;
> >> bool d1_underlay_enable;
> >> bool fbc_enabled;
> >> bool lpt_enabled;
> >> enum bw_defines sclk_message;
> >> enum bw_defines yclk_message;
> >> - enum bw_defines tiling_mode[maximum_number_of_surfaces];
> >> - enum bw_defines surface_type[maximum_number_of_surfaces];
> >> + enum bw_defines *tiling_mode;
> >> + enum bw_defines *surface_type;
> >> enum bw_defines voltage;
> >> enum bw_defines pipe_check;
> >> enum bw_defines hsr_check;
> >> @@ -122,6 +122,22 @@ static void calculate_bandwidth(
> >> int32_t number_of_displays_enabled_with_margin = 0;
> >> int32_t number_of_aligned_displays_with_no_margin = 0;
> >>
> >> + yclk = kcalloc(3, sizeof(*yclk), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!yclk)
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + sclk = kcalloc(8, sizeof(*sclk), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!sclk)
> >> + goto free_yclk;
> >> +
> >> + tiling_mode = kcalloc(maximum_number_of_surfaces, sizeof(*tiling_mode), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!tiling_mode)
> >> + goto free_sclk;
> >> +
> >> + surface_type = kcalloc(maximum_number_of_surfaces, sizeof(*surface_type), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!surface_type)
> >> + goto free_tiling_mode;
> >> +
> >
> >
> > Harry or Nick can correct me if I'm wrong, but for this patch and the
> > next one, I think this can be called from an atomic context.
> >
>
> From what I can see this doesn't seem the case. If I'm missing
> something someone please correct me.
>
> This and the next (06/19) patch are both
> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>

Thanks. I've applied them.

Alex


>
> Harry
>
> > Alex
> >
> >> yclk[low] = vbios->low_yclk;
> >> yclk[mid] = vbios->mid_yclk;
> >> yclk[high] = vbios->high_yclk;
> >> @@ -2013,6 +2029,14 @@ static void calculate_bandwidth(
> >> }
> >> }
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + kfree(surface_type);
> >> +free_tiling_mode:
> >> + kfree(tiling_mode);
> >> +free_yclk:
> >> + kfree(yclk);
> >> +free_sclk:
> >> + kfree(sclk);
> >> }
> >>
> >> /*******************************************************************************
> >> --
> >> 2.27.0
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dri-devel mailing list
> >> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>