Re: [PATCH] hyperv: Few mundane typo fixes

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Sun Mar 21 2021 - 19:49:00 EST


On March 21, 2021 4:31:08 PM PDT, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>s/sructure/structure/
>s/extention/extension/
>s/offerred/offered/
>s/adversley/adversely/
>
>Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>---
> include/linux/hyperv.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/hyperv.h b/include/linux/hyperv.h
>index f1d74dcf0353..2c18c8e768ef 100644
>--- a/include/linux/hyperv.h
>+++ b/include/linux/hyperv.h
>@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ struct vmbus_channel_offer {
>
> /*
> * Pipes:
>- * The following sructure is an integrated pipe protocol, which
>+ * The following structure is an integrated pipe protocol, which
> * is implemented on top of standard user-defined data. Pipe
> * clients have MAX_PIPE_USER_DEFINED_BYTES left for their own
> * use.
>@@ -883,11 +883,11 @@ struct vmbus_channel {
> * Support for sub-channels. For high performance devices,
> * it will be useful to have multiple sub-channels to support
> * a scalable communication infrastructure with the host.
>- * The support for sub-channels is implemented as an extention
>+ * The support for sub-channels is implemented as an extension
> * to the current infrastructure.
> * The initial offer is considered the primary channel and this
> * offer message will indicate if the host supports sub-channels.
>- * The guest is free to ask for sub-channels to be offerred and can
>+ * The guest is free to ask for sub-channels to be offered and can
> * open these sub-channels as a normal "primary" channel. However,
> * all sub-channels will have the same type and instance guids as the
> * primary channel. Requests sent on a given channel will result in a
>@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ struct vmbus_channel {
> * Clearly, these optimizations improve throughput at the expense of
> * latency. Furthermore, since the channel is shared for both
> * control and data messages, control messages currently suffer
>- * unnecessary latency adversley impacting performance and boot
>+ * unnecessary latency adversely impacting performance and boot
> * time. To fix this issue, permit tagging the channel as being
> * in "low latency" mode. In this mode, we will bypass the monitor
> * mechanism.
>--
>2.31.0


--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.