Re: [PATCH 1/5] cifsd: add server handler and tranport layers

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:01:22PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:13:40PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> > > +#define RESPONSE_BUF(w)		((void *)(w)->response_buf)
> > > +#define REQUEST_BUF(w)		((void *)(w)->request_buf)
> > 
> > Why do you do this obfuscation?
> I don't remember exactly, but back then, It looked easier...
> > 
> > > +#define RESPONSE_BUF_NEXT(w)	\
> > > +	((void *)((w)->response_buf + (w)->next_smb2_rsp_hdr_off))
> > > +#define REQUEST_BUF_NEXT(w)	\
> > > +	((void *)((w)->request_buf + (w)->next_smb2_rcv_hdr_off))
> > 
> > These obfuscations aren't even used; delete them
> They are used in many place.

Oh, argh.  patch 2/5 was too big, so it didn't make it into the mailing
list archive I was using to try to review this series.  Please break it
up into smaller pieces for next time!