Re: [PATCH 8/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add AOSS QMP node

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Sibi Sankar (2021-03-08 21:58:21)
> On 2021-02-27 19:26, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> > On 2021-02-27 00:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 23:51:00)
> >>> On 2021-02-26 01:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>> > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 01:30:24)
> >>> >> Add a DT node for the AOSS QMP on SC7280 SoC.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> >> ---
> >>> >>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >>> >>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >>> >>
> >>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> >>> >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> >>> >> index 65c1e0f2fb56..cbd567ccc04e 100644
> >>> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> >>> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> >>> >> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >>> >>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
> >>> >>  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> >>> >>  #include <dt-bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.h>
> >>> >> +#include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-aoss-qmp.h>
> >>> >>  #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>  / {
> >>> >> @@ -368,6 +369,19 @@ pdc: interrupt-controller@b220000 {
> >>> >>                         interrupt-controller;
> >>> >>                 };
> >>> >>
> >>> >> +               aoss_qmp: qmp@c300000 {
> >>> >
> >>> > power-domain-controller@c300000? power-controller@c300000?
> >>> >
> >>> 
> >>> Its an AOSS message RAM and all other SM* SoCs have as qmp@
> >>> and the dt binding as well, I see only SM8150 with power-controller,
> >>> that should probably be fixed?
> >> 
> >> Node name should be generic while still being meaningful. Nobody knows
> >> what qmp is, but power-controller makes sense. Can you fix this and 
> >> the
> >> others to be power-controller?
> >> 
> 
> we probably would be changing them back
> to qmp or something more generic soon
> since the consensus was qmp wasn't a
> power-controller. So not sure if its
> worth the effort here.
> 

Hmm alright. Maybe mailbox? qmp is not generic. What does it stand for?
qualcomm messaging protocol?