Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] PM / devfreq: a few small fixes and improvements

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi,

On 3/23/21 3:11 PM, Aisheng Dong wrote:
>> From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 12:11 PM
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/23/21 12:25 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
>>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:13 AM Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A few small fixes and improvements
>>>>
>>>> ChangeLog:
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>>  * squash a few patches
>>>>  * rebase to devfreq-testing
>>>
>>> I have to rebase to devfreq-testing instead of devfreq-next because
>>> below two patches only exist in devfreq-testing.
>>> 5cc75e9252e9 (devfreq/devfreq-testing) PM / devfreq: Add
>>> devfreq_transitions debugfs file
>>> dc9e557845c1 PM / devfreq: Add new up_threshold and down_differential
>>> sysfs attrs My patch 5 needs change based on it according to your
>>> suggestion. So i have to rebase to that branch.
>>>
>>> However, i found devfreq-testing can't build with GOV_PASSVIE enabled.
>>> Patch 1 fixed it. You can squash to the original one when apply.
>>>
>>> Please help take a look at this new series.
>>
>> Please rebase your patches either devfreq-next or linux-next.git Because
>> devfreq-testing branch is not official.
> 
> Okay, then how about the patch 5 below?
> [PATCH V2 5/6] PM / devfreq: governor: optimize simpleondemand get_target_freq
> 
> Should I also rebase it to devfreq-next or drop it first and then resend when your patch
> merged into mainline?

Yes. Thanks.

[snip]

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics