Re: [PATCH v2] usb: Add a lock when freeing data in usbtmc_disconnect

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:28:54AM -0700, Lv Yunlong wrote:
> In usbtmc_disconnect, data is got from intf with the initial reference.
> There is no refcount inc operation before usbmc_free_int(data). In
> usbmc_free_int(data), the data may be freed.
> 
> But later in usbtmc_disconnect, there is another put function of data.
> It could cause errors in race.
> 
> My patch adds a lock to protect kref from changing in race.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
> index 74d5a9c5238a..44f1fcabbb1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
> @@ -2493,8 +2493,13 @@ static void usbtmc_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
>  		usb_scuttle_anchored_urbs(&file_data->in_anchor);
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&data->io_mutex);
> +
> +	spinlock_t *dev_lock = &data->dev_lock;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(dev_lock);
>  	usbtmc_free_int(data);
>  	kref_put(&data->kref, usbtmc_delete);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(dev_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void usbtmc_draw_down(struct usbtmc_file_data *file_data)
> -- 
> 2.25.1

You obviously did not even build this patch, let alone test it :(

Please do not waste maintainer's time by not doing the proper steps when
submitting patches.

thanks,

greg k-h