Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: arm64: Drop the CPU_FTR_REG_HYP_COPY infrastructure

From: Quentin Perret
Date: Tue Mar 23 2021 - 05:48:57 EST

Next message: Sudeep Holla: "Re: [PATCH v7 25/38] iio/scmi: port driver to the new scmi_sensor_proto_ops interface"
Previous message: Suzuki K Poulose: "Re: [PATCH -next] coresight: etm-perf: Mark format_attr_contextid with static keyword"
In reply to: Marc Zyngier: "[PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: arm64: Drop the CPU_FTR_REG_HYP_COPY infrastructure"
Next in thread: Marc Zyngier: "[PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: arm64: Constraint KVM's own __flush_dcache_area to protectected mode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Monday 22 Mar 2021 at 17:56:39 (+0000), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Now that the read_ctr macro has been specialised for nVHE,
> the whole CPU_FTR_REG_HYP_COPY infrastrcture looks completely
> overengineered.
>
> Simplify it by populating the two u64 quantities (MMFR0 and 1)
> that the hypervisor need.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Quentin

Next message: Sudeep Holla: "Re: [PATCH v7 25/38] iio/scmi: port driver to the new scmi_sensor_proto_ops interface"
Previous message: Suzuki K Poulose: "Re: [PATCH -next] coresight: etm-perf: Mark format_attr_contextid with static keyword"
In reply to: Marc Zyngier: "[PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: arm64: Drop the CPU_FTR_REG_HYP_COPY infrastructure"
Next in thread: Marc Zyngier: "[PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: arm64: Constraint KVM's own __flush_dcache_area to protectected mode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]