Re: [PATCH] selftests: kvm: make hardware_disable_test less verbose

From: Andrew Jones
Date: Tue Mar 23 2021 - 06:04:12 EST


On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 09:53:03AM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> hardware_disable_test produces 512 snippets like
> ...
> main: [511] waiting semaphore
> run_test: [511] start vcpus
> run_test: [511] all threads launched
> main: [511] waiting 368us
> main: [511] killing child
>
> and this doesn't have much value, let's just drop these fprintf().
> Restoring them for debugging purposes shouldn't be too hard.

Changing them to pr_debug() allows you to keep them and restore
with -DDEBUG

Thanks,
drew

>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
> index 2f2eeb8a1d86..d6d4517c4a8a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ static void run_test(uint32_t run)
> kvm_vm_elf_load(vm, program_invocation_name, 0, 0);
> vm_create_irqchip(vm);
>
> - fprintf(stderr, "%s: [%d] start vcpus\n", __func__, run);
> for (i = 0; i < VCPU_NUM; ++i) {
> vm_vcpu_add_default(vm, i, guest_code);
> payloads[i].vm = vm;
> @@ -124,7 +123,6 @@ static void run_test(uint32_t run)
> check_set_affinity(throw_away, &cpu_set);
> }
> }
> - fprintf(stderr, "%s: [%d] all threads launched\n", __func__, run);
> sem_post(sem);
> for (i = 0; i < VCPU_NUM; ++i)
> check_join(threads[i], &b);
> @@ -147,16 +145,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> if (pid == 0)
> run_test(i); /* This function always exits */
>
> - fprintf(stderr, "%s: [%d] waiting semaphore\n", __func__, i);
> sem_wait(sem);
> r = (rand() % DELAY_US_MAX) + 1;
> - fprintf(stderr, "%s: [%d] waiting %dus\n", __func__, i, r);
> usleep(r);
> r = waitpid(pid, &s, WNOHANG);
> TEST_ASSERT(r != pid,
> "%s: [%d] child exited unexpectedly status: [%d]",
> __func__, i, s);
> - fprintf(stderr, "%s: [%d] killing child\n", __func__, i);
> kill(pid, SIGKILL);
> }
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>