[PATCH v2 4/6] soc: mediatek: devapc: rename variable for new IC support

[Nina Wu]

From: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

For new ICs, there are multiple devapc HWs for different subsys.
For example, there is devapc respectively for infra, peri, peri2, etc.
So we rename the variable 'infra_base' to 'base' for code readability.

Signed-off-by: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
index 68c3e35..bcf6e3c 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct mtk_devapc_data {
 
 struct mtk_devapc_context {
 	struct device *dev;
-	void __iomem *infra_base;
+	void __iomem *base;
 	u32 vio_idx_num;
 	struct clk *infra_clk;
 	const struct mtk_devapc_data *data;
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void clear_vio_status(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 	void __iomem *reg;
 	int i;
 
-	reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_sta_offset;
+	reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_sta_offset;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->vio_idx_num - 1); i++)
 		writel(GENMASK(31, 0), reg + 4 * i);
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static void mask_module_irq(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx, bool mask)
 	u32 val;
 	int i;
 
-	reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_mask_offset;
+	reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_mask_offset;
 
 	if (mask)
 		val = GENMASK(31, 0);
@@ -113,11 +113,11 @@ static int devapc_sync_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 	int ret;
 	u32 val;
 
-	pd_vio_shift_sta_reg = ctx->infra_base +
+	pd_vio_shift_sta_reg = ctx->base +
 			       ctx->data->vio_shift_sta_offset;
-	pd_vio_shift_sel_reg = ctx->infra_base +
+	pd_vio_shift_sel_reg = ctx->base +
 			       ctx->data->vio_shift_sel_offset;
-	pd_vio_shift_con_reg = ctx->infra_base +
+	pd_vio_shift_con_reg = ctx->base +
 			       ctx->data->vio_shift_con_offset;
 
 	/* Find the minimum shift group which has violation */
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ static void devapc_extract_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 	void __iomem *vio_dbg0_reg;
 	void __iomem *vio_dbg1_reg;
 
-	vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_dbg0_offset;
-	vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_dbg1_offset;
+	vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_dbg0_offset;
+	vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_dbg1_offset;
 
 	vio_dbgs.vio_dbg0 = readl(vio_dbg0_reg);
 	vio_dbgs.vio_dbg1 = readl(vio_dbg1_reg);
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static irqreturn_t devapc_violation_irq(int irq_number, void *data)
  */
 static void start_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 {
-	writel(BIT(31), ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->apc_con_offset);
+	writel(BIT(31), ctx->base + ctx->data->apc_con_offset);
 
 	mask_module_irq(ctx, false);
 }
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static void stop_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 {
 	mask_module_irq(ctx, true);
 
-	writel(BIT(2), ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->apc_con_offset);
+	writel(BIT(2), ctx->base + ctx->data->apc_con_offset);
 }
 
 static const struct mtk_devapc_data devapc_mt6779 = {
@@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ static int mtk_devapc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ctx->data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
 	ctx->dev = &pdev->dev;
 
-	ctx->infra_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
-	if (!ctx->infra_base)
+	ctx->base = of_iomap(node, 0);
+	if (!ctx->base)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "vio_idx_num", &ctx->vio_idx_num))
-- 
2.6.4