Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] kunit: support failure from dynamic analysis tools

[Brendan Higgins]

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:23 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add a kunit_fail_current_test() function to fail the currently running
> test, if any, with an error message.
>
> This is largely intended for dynamic analysis tools like UBSAN and for
> fakes.
> E.g. say I had a fake ops struct for testing and I wanted my `free`
> function to complain if it was called with an invalid argument, or
> caught a double-free. Most return void and have no normal means of
> signalling failure (e.g. super_operations, iommu_ops, etc.).
>
> Key points:
> * Always update current->kunit_test so anyone can use it.
>   * commit 83c4e7a0363b ("KUnit: KASAN Integration") only updated it for
>   CONFIG_KASAN=y
>
> * Create a new header <kunit/test-bug.h> so non-test code doesn't have
> to include all of <kunit/test.h> (e.g. lib/ubsan.c)
>
> * Forward the file and line number to make it easier to track down
> failures
>
> * Declare the helper function for nice __printf() warnings about mismatched
> format strings even when KUnit is not enabled.
>
> Example output from kunit_fail_current_test("message"):
> [15:19:34] [FAILED] example_simple_test
> [15:19:34]     # example_simple_test: initializing
> [15:19:34]     # example_simple_test: lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:24: message
> [15:19:34]     not ok 1 - example_simple_test
>
> Co-developed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>