Re: [igb] netconsole triggers warning in netpoll_poll_dev
From: Oleksandr Natalenko
Date: Wed Apr 07 2021 - 02:01:06 EST
Hello.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 11:48:02AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:36:19 +0200 Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I've raised this here [1] first, but was suggested to engage igb devs,
> > so here we are.
> >
> > I'm experiencing the following woes while using netconsole regularly:
> >
> > ```
> > [22038.710800] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [22038.710801] igb_poll+0x0/0x1440 [igb] exceeded budget in poll
> > [22038.710802] WARNING: CPU: 12 PID: 40362 at net/core/netpoll.c:155 netpoll_poll_dev+0x18a/0x1a0
> > [22038.710802] Modules linked in: ...
> > [22038.710835] CPU: 12 PID: 40362 Comm: systemd-sleep Not tainted 5.11.0-pf7 #1
> > [22038.710836] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/Pro WS X570-ACE, BIOS 3302 03/05/2021
> > [22038.710836] RIP: 0010:netpoll_poll_dev+0x18a/0x1a0
> > [22038.710837] Code: 6e ff 80 3d d2 9d f8 00 00 0f 85 5c ff ff ff 48 8b 73 28 48 c7 c7 0c b8 21 84 89 44 24 04 c6 05 b6 9d f8 00 01 e8 84 21 1c 00 <0f> 0b 8b 54 24 04 e9 36 ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00
> > [22038.710838] RSP: 0018:ffffb24106e37ba0 EFLAGS: 00010086
> > [22038.710838] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9599d2929c50 RCX: ffff959f8ed1ac30
> > [22038.710839] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000023 RDI: ffff959f8ed1ac28
> > [22038.710839] RBP: ffff9598981d4058 R08: 0000000000000019 R09: ffffb24206e3796d
> > [22038.710839] R10: ffffffffffffffff R11: ffffb24106e37968 R12: ffff959887e51ec8
> > [22038.710840] R13: 000000000000000c R14: 00000000ffffffff R15: ffff9599d2929c60
> > [22038.710840] FS: 00007f3ade370a40(0000) GS:ffff959f8ed00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [22038.710841] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > [22038.710841] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000003017b0000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0
> > [22038.710841] Call Trace:
> > [22038.710842] netpoll_send_skb+0x185/0x240
> > [22038.710842] write_msg+0xe5/0x100 [netconsole]
> > [22038.710842] console_unlock+0x37d/0x640
> > [22038.710842] ? __schedule+0x2e5/0xc90
> > [22038.710843] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x2ac/0x7f0
> > [22038.710843] pm_suspend.cold+0x321/0x36c
> > [22038.710843] state_store+0xa6/0x140
> > [22038.710844] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x124/0x1b0
> > [22038.710844] new_sync_write+0x16a/0x200
> > [22038.710844] vfs_write+0x21c/0x2e0
> > [22038.710844] __x64_sys_write+0x6d/0xf0
> > [22038.710845] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
> > [22038.710845] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > [22038.710845] RIP: 0033:0x7f3adece10f7
> > [22038.710846] Code: 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
> > [22038.710847] RSP: 002b:00007ffc51c555b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> > [22038.710847] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f3adece10f7
> > [22038.710848] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00007ffc51c556a0 RDI: 0000000000000004
> > [22038.710848] RBP: 00007ffc51c556a0 R08: 000055ea374302a0 R09: 00007f3aded770c0
> > [22038.710849] R10: 00007f3aded76fc0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004
> > [22038.710849] R13: 000055ea3742c430 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: 00007f3adedb3700
> > [22038.710849] ---[ end trace 6eae54fbf23807f8 ]---
> > ```
> >
> > This one happened during suspend/resume cycle (on resume), followed by:
> >
> > ```
> > [22038.868669] igb 0000:05:00.0 enp5s0: Reset adapter
> > [22040.998673] igb 0000:05:00.0 enp5s0: Reset adapter
> > [22043.819198] igb 0000:05:00.0 enp5s0: igb: enp5s0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX
> > ```
> >
> > I've bumped into a similar issue in BZ 211911 [2] (see c#16),
> > and in c#17 it was suggested it was a separate unrelated issue,
> > hence I'm raising a new concern.
> >
> > Please help in finding out why this woe happens and in fixing it.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212573
> > [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211911
>
> Looks like igb_clean_tx_irq() should not return true if budget is 0,
> ever, otherwise we risk hitting the min(work, budget - 1) which may
> go negative.
>
> So something like this?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> index c9e8c65a3cfe..7a237b5311ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> @@ -8028,7 +8028,7 @@ static bool igb_clean_tx_irq(struct igb_q_vector *q_vector, int napi_budget)
> unsigned int i = tx_ring->next_to_clean;
>
> if (test_bit(__IGB_DOWN, &adapter->state))
> - return true;
> + goto out;
>
> tx_buffer = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[i];
> tx_desc = IGB_TX_DESC(tx_ring, i);
> @@ -8157,7 +8157,7 @@ static bool igb_clean_tx_irq(struct igb_q_vector *q_vector, int napi_budget)
> tx_ring->queue_index);
>
> /* we are about to reset, no point in enabling stuff */
> - return true;
> + goto out;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -8180,7 +8180,7 @@ static bool igb_clean_tx_irq(struct igb_q_vector *q_vector, int napi_budget)
> u64_stats_update_end(&tx_ring->tx_syncp);
> }
> }
> -
> +out:
> return !!budget;
> }
Thanks for the effort, but reportedly [1] it made no difference,
unfortunately.
[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212573#c8
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)