Re: [PATCH] eeprom: at24: avoid adjusting offset for 24AA025E{48, 64}

From: Bartosz Golaszewski
Date: Wed Apr 07 2021 - 14:37:42 EST

Next message: Wei Xu: "Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm/vmscan: add helper for querying ability to age anonymous pages"
Previous message: Florian Fainelli: "Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for Brcmstb endpoint device voltage regulators"
In reply to: Claudiu Beznea: "[PATCH] eeprom: at24: avoid adjusting offset for 24AA025E{48, 64}"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:24 PM Claudiu Beznea
<claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Some EEPROMs could be used only for MAC storage. In this case the
> EEPROM areas where MACs resides could be modeled as NVMEM cells
> (directly via DT bindings) such that the already available networking
> infrastructure to read properly the MAC addresses (via
> of_get_mac_address()). Add "atmel,24mac02e4", "atmel,24mac02e4"
> compatible for the usage w/ 24AA025E{48, 64} type of EEPROMs and adapt
> the driver to not do offset adjustments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> For the previously available compatibles the offset adjustment is done
> (probably for compatibility w/ old DT bindings?). In my scenario 24AA025E48
> is used in setup with macb driver which is calling of_get_mac_address()
> to get the proper NVMEM cell in EEPROM where the MAC resides and read
> directly from there. We modeled the EEPROM and NVMEM cell in DT as
> follows:
>
> &i2cnode {
> // ...
> eeprom0: eeprom0@52 {
> compatible = "atmel,24mac02e4";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> reg = <0x52>;
> pagesize = <16>;
> size = <256>;
> status = "okay";
>
> eeprom0_eui48: eui48@fa {
> reg = <0xfa 0x6>;
> };
> };
> };
>
> &gmac {
> // ...
>
> nvmem-cells = <&eeprom0_eui48>;
> nvmem-cell-names = "mac-address";
>
> // ...
> };
>
>
> Let me know if some other approach needs to be taken into account in
> at24 driver for this to work.
>
> Thank you,
> Claudiu Beznea
>

Hi Claudiu,

First of all: any new compatibles need to go into the DT bindings document.

> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> index 926408b41270..ae2fbcb5e83d 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> @@ -123,17 +123,19 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(at24_write_timeout, "Time (in ms) to try writes (default 25)");
> struct at24_chip_data {
> u32 byte_len;
> u8 flags;
> + u8 adjoff;
> void (*read_post)(unsigned int off, char *buf, size_t count);
> };
>
> -#define AT24_CHIP_DATA(_name, _len, _flags) \
> +#define AT24_CHIP_DATA(_name, _len, _flags, _adjoff) \
> static const struct at24_chip_data _name = { \
> - .byte_len = _len, .flags = _flags, \
> + .byte_len = _len, .flags = _flags, .adjoff = _adjoff, \
> }
>
> -#define AT24_CHIP_DATA_CB(_name, _len, _flags, _read_post) \
> +#define AT24_CHIP_DATA_CB(_name, _len, _flags, _adjoff, _read_post) \
> static const struct at24_chip_data _name = { \
> .byte_len = _len, .flags = _flags, \
> + .adjoff = _adjoff, \
> .read_post = _read_post, \
> }
>
> @@ -158,48 +160,52 @@ static void at24_read_post_vaio(unsigned int off, char *buf, size_t count)
> }
>
> /* needs 8 addresses as A0-A2 are ignored */
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c00, 128 / 8, AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c00, 128 / 8, AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR, 0);
> /* old variants can't be handled with this generic entry! */
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c01, 1024 / 8, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c01, 1024 / 8, 0, 0);
> AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24cs01, 16,
> - AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c02, 2048 / 8, 0);
> + AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c02, 2048 / 8, 0, 0);
> AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24cs02, 16,
> - AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
> + AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 0);
> AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24mac402, 48 / 8,
> - AT24_FLAG_MAC | AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
> + AT24_FLAG_MAC | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 1);
> AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24mac602, 64 / 8,
> - AT24_FLAG_MAC | AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
> + AT24_FLAG_MAC | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 1);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24mac02e4, 48 / 8,
> + AT24_FLAG_MAC | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24mac02e6, 64 / 8,
> + AT24_FLAG_MAC | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 0);
> /* spd is a 24c02 in memory DIMMs */
> AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_spd, 2048 / 8,
> - AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO);
> + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO, 0);
> /* 24c02_vaio is a 24c02 on some Sony laptops */
> AT24_CHIP_DATA_CB(at24_data_24c02_vaio, 2048 / 8,
> - AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO,
> + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO, 0,
> at24_read_post_vaio);
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c04, 4096 / 8, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c04, 4096 / 8, 0, 0);
> AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24cs04, 16,
> - AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
> + AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 0);
> /* 24rf08 quirk is handled at i2c-core */
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c08, 8192 / 8, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c08, 8192 / 8, 0, 0);
> AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24cs08, 16,
> - AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c16, 16384 / 8, 0);
> + AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c16, 16384 / 8, 0, 0);
> AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24cs16, 16,
> - AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c32, 32768 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16);
> + AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c32, 32768 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16, 0);
> AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24cs32, 16,
> - AT24_FLAG_ADDR16 | AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c64, 65536 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16);
> + AT24_FLAG_ADDR16 | AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c64, 65536 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16, 0);
> AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24cs64, 16,
> - AT24_FLAG_ADDR16 | AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c128, 131072 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16);
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c256, 262144 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16);
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c512, 524288 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16);
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c1024, 1048576 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16);
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c2048, 2097152 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16);
> + AT24_FLAG_ADDR16 | AT24_FLAG_SERIAL | AT24_FLAG_READONLY, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c128, 131072 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c256, 262144 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c512, 524288 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c1024, 1048576 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_24c2048, 2097152 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16, 0);
> /* identical to 24c08 ? */
> -AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_INT3499, 8192 / 8, 0);
> +AT24_CHIP_DATA(at24_data_INT3499, 8192 / 8, 0, 0);
>
> static const struct i2c_device_id at24_ids[] = {
> { "24c00", (kernel_ulong_t)&at24_data_24c00 },
> @@ -208,7 +214,9 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id at24_ids[] = {
> { "24c02", (kernel_ulong_t)&at24_data_24c02 },
> { "24cs02", (kernel_ulong_t)&at24_data_24cs02 },
> { "24mac402", (kernel_ulong_t)&at24_data_24mac402 },
> + { "24mac02e4", (kernel_ulong_t)&at24_data_24mac02e4 },
> { "24mac602", (kernel_ulong_t)&at24_data_24mac602 },
> + { "24mac02e6", (kernel_ulong_t)&at24_data_24mac02e6 },
> { "spd", (kernel_ulong_t)&at24_data_spd },
> { "24c02-vaio", (kernel_ulong_t)&at24_data_24c02_vaio },
> { "24c04", (kernel_ulong_t)&at24_data_24c04 },
> @@ -238,7 +246,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id at24_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "atmel,24c02", .data = &at24_data_24c02 },
> { .compatible = "atmel,24cs02", .data = &at24_data_24cs02 },
> { .compatible = "atmel,24mac402", .data = &at24_data_24mac402 },
> + { .compatible = "atmel,24mac02e4", .data = &at24_data_24mac02e4 },
> { .compatible = "atmel,24mac602", .data = &at24_data_24mac602 },
> + { .compatible = "atmel,24mac02e6", .data = &at24_data_24mac02e6 },
> { .compatible = "atmel,spd", .data = &at24_data_spd },
> { .compatible = "atmel,24c04", .data = &at24_data_24c04 },
> { .compatible = "atmel,24cs04", .data = &at24_data_24cs04 },
> @@ -690,7 +700,8 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> at24->flags = flags;
> at24->read_post = cdata->read_post;
> at24->num_addresses = num_addresses;
> - at24->offset_adj = at24_get_offset_adj(flags, byte_len);
> + at24->offset_adj = cdata->adjoff ?
> + at24_get_offset_adj(flags, byte_len) : 0;
> at24->client[0].client = client;
> at24->client[0].regmap = regmap;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>

What is the problem you're trying to solve? The MAC area is accessible
on a different device address. The variants with serial and MAC areas
are meant to be instantiated as devices separate from the main
writeable area and you can then create an nvmem cell that will take up
the whole MAC.

Or does your model keep the MAC in the same block that's used for
writing? In which case just using a regular compatible that matches
the size and creating the nvmem cell at the right offset should be
enough, right?

Am I missing something?

Bartosz

Next message: Wei Xu: "Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm/vmscan: add helper for querying ability to age anonymous pages"
Previous message: Florian Fainelli: "Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for Brcmstb endpoint device voltage regulators"
In reply to: Claudiu Beznea: "[PATCH] eeprom: at24: avoid adjusting offset for 24AA025E{48, 64}"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]