Re: [PATCH -next] gma500: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock

From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Thu Apr 08 2021 - 07:20:29 EST


On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 07:55:14PM +0800, Huang Guobin wrote:
> From: Guobin Huang <huangguobin4@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
> rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init().
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Guobin Huang <huangguobin4@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to drm-misc-next, thanks for your patch.
-Daniel

> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/power.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/power.c
> index 56ef88237ef6..f07641dfa5a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/power.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>
> static struct mutex power_mutex; /* Serialize power ops */
> -static spinlock_t power_ctrl_lock; /* Serialize power claim */
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(power_ctrl_lock); /* Serialize power claim */
>
> /**
> * gma_power_init - initialise power manager
> @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ void gma_power_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> dev_priv->display_power = true; /* We start active */
> dev_priv->display_count = 0; /* Currently no users */
> dev_priv->suspended = false; /* And not suspended */
> - spin_lock_init(&power_ctrl_lock);
> mutex_init(&power_mutex);
>
> if (dev_priv->ops->init_pm)
>

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch