Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] tracing/hwlat: Implement the per-cpu mode

From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
Date: Thu Apr 15 2021 - 09:22:59 EST


On 4/14/21 4:41 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:13:21 +0200
> Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Implements the per-cpu mode in which a sampling thread is created for
>> each cpu in the "cpus" (and tracing_mask).
>>
>> The per-cpu mode has the potention to speed up the hwlat detection by
>> running on multiple CPUs at the same time.
>
> And totally slow down the entire system in the process ;-)

Too :-) But this is not the default config... So it should be an intentional change.

>>
>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Clark Willaims <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> Documentation/trace/hwlat_detector.rst | 6 +-
>> kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/hwlat_detector.rst b/Documentation/trace/hwlat_detector.rst
>> index f63fdd867598..7a6fab105b29 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/trace/hwlat_detector.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/trace/hwlat_detector.rst
>> @@ -85,10 +85,12 @@ the available options are:
>>
>> - none: do not force migration
>> - round-robin: migrate across each CPU specified in cpus between each window
>> + - per-cpu: create a per-cpu thread for each cpu in cpus
>>
>> By default, hwlat detector will also obey the tracing_cpumask, so the thread
>> will be placed only in the set of cpus that is both on the hwlat detector's
>> cpus and in the global tracing_cpumask file. The user can overwrite the
>> cpumask by setting it manually. Changing the hwlatd affinity externally,
>> -e.g., via taskset tool, will disable the round-robin migration.
>> -
>> +e.g., via taskset tool, will disable the round-robin migration. In the
>> +per-cpu mode, the per-cpu thread (hwlatd/CPU) will be pinned to its relative
>> +cpu, and its affinity cannot be changed.
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
>> index 3818200c9e24..52968ea312df 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>> * Copyright (C) 2008-2009 Jon Masters, Red Hat, Inc. <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> * Copyright (C) 2013-2016 Steven Rostedt, Red Hat, Inc. <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> *
>> - * Includes useful feedback from Clark Williams <clark@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> + * Includes useful feedback from Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Interesting update ;-)

Should I make it a separated patch? :-)

>> *
>> */
>> #include <linux/kthread.h>
>> @@ -54,9 +54,6 @@ static struct trace_array *hwlat_trace;
>> #define DEFAULT_SAMPLE_WIDTH 500000 /* 0.5s */
>> #define DEFAULT_LAT_THRESHOLD 10 /* 10us */
>>
>> -/* sampling thread*/
>> -static struct task_struct *hwlat_kthread;
>> -
>> static struct dentry *hwlat_sample_width; /* sample width us */
>> static struct dentry *hwlat_sample_window; /* sample window us */
>> static struct dentry *hwlat_cpumask_dentry; /* hwlat cpus allowed */
>> @@ -65,19 +62,27 @@ static struct dentry *hwlat_thread_mode; /* hwlat thread mode */
>> enum {
>> MODE_NONE = 0,
>> MODE_ROUND_ROBIN,
>> + MODE_PER_CPU,
>> MODE_MAX
>> };
>>
>> -static char *thread_mode_str[] = { "none", "round-robin" };
>> +static char *thread_mode_str[] = { "none", "round-robin", "per-cpu" };
>>
>> /* Save the previous tracing_thresh value */
>> static unsigned long save_tracing_thresh;
>>
>> -/* NMI timestamp counters */
>> -static u64 nmi_ts_start;
>> -static u64 nmi_total_ts;
>> -static int nmi_count;
>> -static int nmi_cpu;
>> +/* runtime kthread data */
>> +struct hwlat_kthread_data {
>> + struct task_struct *kthread;
>> + /* NMI timestamp counters */
>> + u64 nmi_ts_start;
>> + u64 nmi_total_ts;
>> + int nmi_count;
>> + int nmi_cpu;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct hwlat_kthread_data hwlat_single_cpu_data;
>> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hwlat_kthread_data, hwlat_per_cpu_data);
>>
>> /* Tells NMIs to call back to the hwlat tracer to record timestamps */
>> bool trace_hwlat_callback_enabled;
>> @@ -114,6 +119,14 @@ static struct hwlat_data {
>> .thread_mode = MODE_ROUND_ROBIN
>> };
>>
>> +struct hwlat_kthread_data *get_cpu_data(void)
>> +{
>> + if (hwlat_data.thread_mode == MODE_PER_CPU)
>> + return this_cpu_ptr(&hwlat_per_cpu_data);
>> + else
>> + return &hwlat_single_cpu_data;
>> +}
>> +
>> static bool hwlat_busy;
>>
>> static void trace_hwlat_sample(struct hwlat_sample *sample)
>> @@ -151,7 +164,9 @@ static void trace_hwlat_sample(struct hwlat_sample *sample)
>>
>> void trace_hwlat_callback(bool enter)
>> {
>> - if (smp_processor_id() != nmi_cpu)
>> + struct hwlat_kthread_data *kdata = get_cpu_data();
>> +
>> + if (kdata->kthread)
>> return;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -160,13 +175,13 @@ void trace_hwlat_callback(bool enter)
>> */
>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK)) {
>> if (enter)
>> - nmi_ts_start = time_get();
>> + kdata->nmi_ts_start = time_get();
>> else
>> - nmi_total_ts += time_get() - nmi_ts_start;
>> + kdata->nmi_total_ts += time_get() - kdata->nmi_ts_start;
>> }
>>
>> if (enter)
>> - nmi_count++;
>> + kdata->nmi_count++;
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -178,6 +193,7 @@ void trace_hwlat_callback(bool enter)
>> */
>> static int get_sample(void)
>> {
>> + struct hwlat_kthread_data *kdata = get_cpu_data();
>> struct trace_array *tr = hwlat_trace;
>> struct hwlat_sample s;
>> time_type start, t1, t2, last_t2;
>> @@ -190,9 +206,8 @@ static int get_sample(void)
>>
>> do_div(thresh, NSEC_PER_USEC); /* modifies interval value */
>>
>> - nmi_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> - nmi_total_ts = 0;
>> - nmi_count = 0;
>> + kdata->nmi_total_ts = 0;
>> + kdata->nmi_count = 0;
>> /* Make sure NMIs see this first */
>> barrier();
>>
>> @@ -262,15 +277,15 @@ static int get_sample(void)
>> ret = 1;
>>
>> /* We read in microseconds */
>> - if (nmi_total_ts)
>> - do_div(nmi_total_ts, NSEC_PER_USEC);
>> + if (kdata->nmi_total_ts)
>> + do_div(kdata->nmi_total_ts, NSEC_PER_USEC);
>>
>> hwlat_data.count++;
>> s.seqnum = hwlat_data.count;
>> s.duration = sample;
>> s.outer_duration = outer_sample;
>> - s.nmi_total_ts = nmi_total_ts;
>> - s.nmi_count = nmi_count;
>> + s.nmi_total_ts = kdata->nmi_total_ts;
>> + s.nmi_count = kdata->nmi_count;
>> s.count = count;
>> trace_hwlat_sample(&s);
>>
>> @@ -376,23 +391,43 @@ static int kthread_fn(void *data)
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> - * start_kthread - Kick off the hardware latency sampling/detector kthread
>> + * stop_stop_kthread - Inform the hardware latency samping/detector kthread to stop
>> + *
>> + * This kicks the running hardware latency sampling/detector kernel thread and
>> + * tells it to stop sampling now. Use this on unload and at system shutdown.
>> + */
>> +static void stop_single_kthread(void)
>> +{
>> + struct hwlat_kthread_data *kdata = get_cpu_data();
>> + struct task_struct *kthread = kdata->kthread;
>> +
>> + if (!kthread)
>> +
>> + return;
>> + kthread_stop(kthread);
>> +
>> + kdata->kthread = NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * start_single_kthread - Kick off the hardware latency sampling/detector kthread
>> *
>> * This starts the kernel thread that will sit and sample the CPU timestamp
>> * counter (TSC or similar) and look for potential hardware latencies.
>> */
>> -static int start_kthread(struct trace_array *tr)
>> +static int start_single_kthread(struct trace_array *tr)
>> {
>> + struct hwlat_kthread_data *kdata = get_cpu_data();
>> struct cpumask *current_mask = &save_cpumask;
>> struct task_struct *kthread;
>> int next_cpu;
>>
>> - if (hwlat_kthread)
>> + if (kdata->kthread)
>> return 0;
>>
>> -
>> kthread = kthread_create(kthread_fn, NULL, "hwlatd");
>> - if (IS_ERR(kthread)) {
>> + if (IS_ERR(kdata->kthread)) {
>> pr_err(BANNER "could not start sampling thread\n");
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>> @@ -419,24 +454,77 @@ static int start_kthread(struct trace_array *tr)
>>
>> sched_setaffinity(kthread->pid, current_mask);
>>
>> - hwlat_kthread = kthread;
>> + kdata->kthread = kthread;
>> wake_up_process(kthread);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> - * stop_kthread - Inform the hardware latency samping/detector kthread to stop
>> + * stop_per_cpu_kthread - Inform the hardware latency samping/detector kthread to stop
>> *
>> - * This kicks the running hardware latency sampling/detector kernel thread and
>> + * This kicks the running hardware latency sampling/detector kernel threads and
>> * tells it to stop sampling now. Use this on unload and at system shutdown.
>> */
>> -static void stop_kthread(void)
>> +static void stop_per_cpu_kthreads(void)
>> {
>> - if (!hwlat_kthread)
>> - return;
>> - kthread_stop(hwlat_kthread);
>> - hwlat_kthread = NULL;
>> + struct task_struct *kthread;
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> + kthread = per_cpu(hwlat_per_cpu_data, cpu).kthread;
>> + if (kthread)
>> + kthread_stop(kthread);
>
> Probably want:
>
> per_cpu(hwlat_per_cpu_data, cpu).kthread = NULL;
>
> Just to be safe. I don't like to rely on the start doing the job, as things
> can change in the future. Having the clearing here as well makes the code
> more robust.

Ack!

>
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * start_per_cpu_kthread - Kick off the hardware latency sampling/detector kthreads
>> + *
>> + * This starts the kernel threads that will sit on potentially all cpus and
>> + * sample the CPU timestamp counter (TSC or similar) and look for potential
>> + * hardware latencies.
>> + */
>> +static int start_per_cpu_kthreads(struct trace_array *tr)
>> +{
>> + struct cpumask *current_mask = &save_cpumask;
>> + struct cpumask *this_cpumask;
>> + struct task_struct *kthread;
>> + char comm[24];
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&this_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + get_online_cpus();
>> + /*
>> + * Run only on CPUs in which trace and hwlat are allowed to run.
>> + */
>> + cpumask_and(current_mask, tr->tracing_cpumask, &hwlat_cpumask);
>> + /*
>> + * And the CPU is online.
>> + */
>> + cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, current_mask);
>> + put_online_cpus();
>> +
>> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>> + per_cpu(hwlat_per_cpu_data, cpu).kthread = NULL;
>> +
>> + for_each_cpu(cpu, current_mask) {
>> + snprintf(comm, 24, "hwlatd/%d", cpu);
>> +
>> + kthread = kthread_create_on_cpu(kthread_fn, NULL, cpu, comm);
>> + if (IS_ERR(kthread)) {
>> + pr_err(BANNER "could not start sampling thread\n");
>> + stop_per_cpu_kthreads();
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + per_cpu(hwlat_per_cpu_data, cpu).kthread = kthread;
>> + wake_up_process(kthread);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -701,7 +789,8 @@ static int hwlat_mode_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>> * The "none" sets the allowed cpumask for a single hwlatd thread at the
>> * startup and lets the scheduler handle the migration. The default mode is
>> * the "round-robin" one, in which a single hwlatd thread runs, migrating
>> - * among the allowed CPUs in a round-robin fashion.
>> + * among the allowed CPUs in a round-robin fashion. The "per-cpu" mode
>> + * creates one hwlatd thread per allowed CPU.
>> */
>> static ssize_t hwlat_mode_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
>> size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos)
>> @@ -827,14 +916,20 @@ static void hwlat_tracer_start(struct trace_array *tr)
>> {
>> int err;
>>
>> - err = start_kthread(tr);
>> + if (hwlat_data.thread_mode == MODE_PER_CPU)
>> + err = start_per_cpu_kthreads(tr);
>> + else
>> + err = start_single_kthread(tr);
>> if (err)
>> pr_err(BANNER "Cannot start hwlat kthread\n");
>> }
>>
>> static void hwlat_tracer_stop(struct trace_array *tr)
>> {
>> - stop_kthread();
>> + if (hwlat_data.thread_mode == MODE_PER_CPU)
>> + stop_per_cpu_kthreads();
>> + else
>> + stop_single_kthread();
>
> This explains why you have the "busy" check in the changing of the modes.
> But really, I don't see why you cant change the mode. Just stop the
> previous mode, and start the new one.

I will try it!

Thanks!
-- Daniel

> -- Steve
>
>
>> }
>>
>> static int hwlat_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr)
>> @@ -864,7 +959,7 @@ static int hwlat_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr)
>>
>> static void hwlat_tracer_reset(struct trace_array *tr)
>> {
>> - stop_kthread();
>> + hwlat_tracer_stop(tr);
>>
>> /* the tracing threshold is static between runs */
>> last_tracing_thresh = tracing_thresh;
>