Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: sps30: add support for serial interface

From: Lars-Peter Clausen
Date: Sun Apr 25 2021 - 11:52:50 EST


On 4/25/21 3:55 PM, Tomasz Duszynski wrote:
[...]

+struct sps30_serial_priv {
+ struct completion new_frame;
+ char buf[SPS30_SERIAL_MAX_BUF_SIZE];
The driver uses char, but the serdev API uses unsigned char. Just to avoid any surprises I'd use unsigned char for all the buffers in the driver as well.
+ int num;
+ unsigned int chksum;
+ bool escaped;
+ bool done;
+};
+
+static int sps30_serial_xfer(struct sps30_state *state, const char *buf, int size)
+{
+ struct serdev_device *serdev = to_serdev_device(state->dev);
+ struct sps30_serial_priv *priv = state->priv;
+ int ret;
+
+ priv->num = 0;
+ priv->chksum = 0;
+ priv->escaped = false;
+ priv->done = false;
Hm... no locking with regards to the serdev callback. I guess the assumption is that we'll never receive any data without explicitly requesting it.
+
+ ret = serdev_device_write(serdev, buf, size, SPS30_SERIAL_TIMEOUT);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ if (ret != size)
+ return -EIO;
+
+ ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&priv->new_frame, SPS30_SERIAL_TIMEOUT);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ if (!ret)
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+ return 0;
+}
[...]
+static bool sps30_serial_frame_valid(struct sps30_state *state, const char *buf)
+{
+ struct sps30_serial_priv *priv = state->priv;
+
+ if ((priv->num < SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_MIN_SIZE) ||
+ (priv->num != SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_MIN_SIZE +
+ priv->buf[SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_MISO_LEN_OFFSET])) {
+ dev_err(state->dev, "frame has invalid number of bytes\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if ((priv->buf[SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_ADR_OFFSET] != buf[SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_ADR_OFFSET]) ||
+ (priv->buf[SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_CMD_OFFSET] != buf[SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_CMD_OFFSET])) {
+ dev_err(state->dev, "frame has wrong ADR and CMD bytes\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (priv->buf[SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_MISO_STATE_OFFSET]) {
+ dev_err(state->dev, "frame with non-zero state received (0x%02x)\n",
+ priv->buf[SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_MISO_STATE_OFFSET]);
+ //return false;
What's with the out commented line?
+ }
+
+ if (priv->buf[priv->num - 2] != priv->chksum) {
+ dev_err(state->dev, "frame integrity check failed\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static int sps30_serial_command(struct sps30_state *state, char cmd, void *arg, int arg_size,
+ void *rsp, int rsp_size)
+{
+ struct sps30_serial_priv *priv = state->priv;
+ char buf[SPS30_SERIAL_MAX_BUF_SIZE];
+ int ret, size;
+
+ size = sps30_serial_prep_frame(buf, cmd, arg, arg_size);
+ ret = sps30_serial_xfer(state, buf, size);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (!sps30_serial_frame_valid(state, buf))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ if (rsp) {
+ rsp_size = clamp((int)priv->buf[SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_MISO_LEN_OFFSET], 0, rsp_size);
If buf is unsigned char this can be a min_t(unsigned int, ...). And maybe also make rsp_size unsigned int.
+ memcpy(rsp, &priv->buf[SPS30_SERIAL_FRAME_MISO_DATA_OFFSET], rsp_size);
+ }
+
+ return rsp_size;
+}
+
+static int sps30_serial_receive_buf(struct serdev_device *serdev, const unsigned char *buf,
+ size_t size)
+{
+ struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&serdev->dev);
+ struct sps30_serial_priv *priv;
+ struct sps30_state *state;
+ unsigned char byte;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!indio_dev)
+ return 0;

+
+ state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
+ priv = state->priv;
+
+ /* just in case device put some unexpected data on the bus */
+ if (priv->done)
+ return size;
+
+ /* wait for the start of frame */
+ if (!priv->num && size && buf[0] != SPS30_SERIAL_SOF_EOF)
+ return 1;
+
+ if (priv->num + size >= ARRAY_SIZE(priv->buf))
+ size = ARRAY_SIZE(priv->buf) - priv->num;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
+ byte = buf[i];
+ /* remove stuffed bytes on-the-fly */
+ if (byte == SPS30_SERIAL_ESCAPE_CHAR) {
+ priv->escaped = true;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ byte = sps30_serial_get_byte(priv->escaped, byte);
+ if (priv->escaped && !byte)
+ dev_warn(state->dev, "unrecognized escaped char (0x%02x)\n", byte);
+ priv->chksum += byte;
+ /* incrementing here would complete rx just after reading SOF */
+ priv->buf[priv->num] = byte;
+
+ if (priv->num++ && !priv->escaped && byte == SPS30_SERIAL_SOF_EOF) {

This is a bit to tricky for my taste.

How about.

priv->num++

if (priv->num > 1 && ...)

+ /* SOF, EOF and checksum itself are not checksummed */
+ priv->chksum -= 2 * SPS30_SERIAL_SOF_EOF + priv->buf[priv->num - 2];
+ priv->chksum = (unsigned char)~priv->chksum;
To keep the whole checksum stuff simpler, maybe just compute it in sps30_serial_frame_valid() over the whole set of data.
+ priv->done = true;
+ complete(&priv->new_frame);
+ i++;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ priv->escaped = false;
+ }
+
+ return i;
+}
[...]
+static int sps30_serial_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)
+{
[...]
+ return sps30_probe(dev, KBUILD_MODNAME, priv, &sps30_serial_ops);
Usually the IIO device name should just be the part number. Ideally the application should not care about the backend. I'd just pass "sps30" here for the name.
+}