Re: [RFC v2 26/32] x86/mm: Move force_dma_unencrypted() to common code

From: Dave Hansen
Date: Fri May 07 2021 - 17:54:23 EST


> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_common.c
...
> +/* Override for DMA direct allocation check - ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED */
> +bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + /*
> + * For SEV, all DMA must be to unencrypted/shared addresses.
> + */
> + if (sev_active())
> + return true;
> +
> + /*
> + * For SME, all DMA must be to unencrypted addresses if the
> + * device does not support DMA to addresses that include the
> + * encryption mask.
> + */
> + if (sme_active()) {
> + u64 dma_enc_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(__ffs64(sme_me_mask));
> + u64 dma_dev_mask = min_not_zero(dev->coherent_dma_mask,
> + dev->bus_dma_limit);
> +
> + if (dma_dev_mask <= dma_enc_mask)
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}

This doesn't seem much like common code to me. It seems like 100% SEV
code. Is this really where we want to move it?