Re: [PATCH][resend] perf x86 kvm-stat: support to analyze kvm msr

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Sun May 09 2021 - 09:44:19 EST


Em Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 02:05:51AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:33 AM Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Subject: [PATCH][resend] perf x86 kvm-stat: support to analyze kvm msr
> > >
> > > From: Lei Zhao <zhaolei27@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > usage:
> > > - kvm stat
> > > run a command and gather performance counter statistics
> > >
> > > - show the result:
> > > perf kvm stat report --event=msr
> > >
> > > See the msr events:
> > >
> > > Analyze events for all VMs, all VCPUs:
> > >
> > > MSR Access Samples Samples% Time% Min Time Max Time Avg time
> > >
> > > 0x6e0:W 67007 98.17% 98.31% 0.59us 10.69us 0.90us ( +-
> > > 0.10% )
> > > 0x830:W 1186 1.74% 1.60% 0.53us 108.34us 0.82us ( +-
> > > 11.02% )
> > > 0x3b:R 66 0.10% 0.09% 0.56us 1.26us 0.80us ( +-
> > > 3.24% )
> > >
> > > Total Samples:68259, Total events handled time:61150.95us.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lei Zhao <zhaolei27@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo


> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/arch/x86/util/kvm-stat.c | 46
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/kvm-stat.c
> > > b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/kvm-stat.c
> > > index 0729204..c5dd54f 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/kvm-stat.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/kvm-stat.c
> > > @@ -133,11 +133,56 @@ static void ioport_event_decode_key(struct
> > > perf_kvm_stat *kvm __maybe_unused,
> > > .name = "IO Port Access"
> > > };
> > >
> > > + /* The time of emulation msr is from kvm_msr to kvm_entry. */ static
> > > +void msr_event_get_key(struct evsel *evsel,
> > > + struct perf_sample *sample,
> > > + struct event_key *key)
> > > +{
> > > + key->key = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "ecx");
> > > + key->info = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "write"); }
> > > +
> > > +static bool msr_event_begin(struct evsel *evsel,
> > > + struct perf_sample *sample,
> > > + struct event_key *key)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!strcmp(evsel->name, "kvm:kvm_msr")) {
> > > + msr_event_get_key(evsel, sample, key);
> > > + return true;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return false;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool msr_event_end(struct evsel *evsel,
> > > + struct perf_sample *sample __maybe_unused,
> > > + struct event_key *key __maybe_unused) {
> > > + return kvm_entry_event(evsel);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void msr_event_decode_key(struct perf_kvm_stat *kvm
> > > __maybe_unused,
> > > + struct event_key *key,
> > > + char *decode)
> > > +{
> > > + scnprintf(decode, decode_str_len, "%#llx:%s",
> > > + (unsigned long long)key->key,
> > > + key->info ? "W" : "R");
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct kvm_events_ops msr_events = {
> > > + .is_begin_event = msr_event_begin,
> > > + .is_end_event = msr_event_end,
> > > + .decode_key = msr_event_decode_key,
> > > + .name = "MSR Access"
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > const char *kvm_events_tp[] = {
> > > "kvm:kvm_entry",
> > > "kvm:kvm_exit",
> > > "kvm:kvm_mmio",
> > > "kvm:kvm_pio",
> > > + "kvm:kvm_msr",
> > > NULL,
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -145,6 +190,7 @@ struct kvm_reg_events_ops kvm_reg_events_ops[] = {
> > > { .name = "vmexit", .ops = &exit_events },
> > > { .name = "mmio", .ops = &mmio_events },
> > > { .name = "ioport", .ops = &ioport_events },
> > > + { .name = "msr", .ops = &msr_events },
> > > { NULL, NULL },
> > > };
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.7.1
> >

--

- Arnaldo