Re: Regression when booting 5.15 as dom0 on arm64 (WAS: Re: [linux-linus test] 161829: regressions - FAIL)

[Florian Fainelli]

On 5/10/2021 11:15 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On 10/05/2021 09:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:32:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> The pointer dereferenced seems to suggest that the swiotlb hasn't been
>>> allocated. From what I can tell, this may be because swiotlb_force is
>>> set
>>> to SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE, we will still enable the swiotlb when running on
>>> top
>>> of Xen.
>>>
>>> I am not entirely sure what would be the correct fix. Any opinions?
>>
>> Can you try something like the patch below (not even compile tested, but
>> the intent should be obvious?
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> index 16a2b2b1c54d..7671bc153fb1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
>>   #include <asm/tlb.h>
>>   #include <asm/alternative.h>
>>   +#include <xen/arm/swiotlb-xen.h>
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * We need to be able to catch inadvertent references to memstart_addr
>>    * that occur (potentially in generic code) before
>> arm64_memblock_init()
>> @@ -482,7 +484,7 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>>       if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE ||
>>           max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit))
>>           swiotlb_init(1);
>> -    else
>> +    else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN) || !xen_swiotlb_detect())
>>           swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE;
>>         set_max_mapnr(max_pfn - PHYS_PFN_OFFSET);
> 
> I have applied the patch on top of 5.13-rc1 and can confirm I am able to
> boot dom0. Are you going to submit the patch?

Sorry about that Julien and thanks Christoph!
-- 
Florian