Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] regulator: IRQ based event/error notification helpers

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Mon May 10 2021 - 16:20:36 EST


On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:46 PM kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Matti,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on 6efb943b8616ec53a5e444193dccf1af9ad627b5]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Matti-Vaittinen/Extend-regulator-notification-support/20210510-203125
> base: 6efb943b8616ec53a5e444193dccf1af9ad627b5
> config: i386-randconfig-s002-20210510 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
> reproduce:
> # apt-get install sparse
> # sparse version: v0.6.3-341-g8af24329-dirty
> # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/904edb46fa37ac86bc1e7a1629141e037f45ebed
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Matti-Vaittinen/Extend-regulator-notification-support/20210510-203125
> git checkout 904edb46fa37ac86bc1e7a1629141e037f45ebed
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' W=1 ARCH=i386
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:12,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:27,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:6,
> from include/linux/sched.h:12,
> from include/linux/ratelimit.h:6,
> from include/linux/dev_printk.h:16,
> from include/linux/device.h:15,
> from drivers/regulator/irq_helpers.c:10:
> drivers/regulator/irq_helpers.c: In function 'regulator_notifier_isr':
> include/linux/bitops.h:35:2: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
> 35 | for ((bit) = find_first_bit((addr), (size)); \
> | ^~~
> drivers/regulator/irq_helpers.c:242:3: note: in expansion of macro 'for_each_set_bit'
> 242 | for_each_set_bit(j, &stat->notifs, BITS_PER_TYPE(stat->notifs))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/regulator/irq_helpers.c:244:4: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'


Seems like missed {}

Matti, there is a serious question: how had you tested this...
(besides obvious compilation error)
Perhaps you have to fix your process somewhere to avoid missing important steps?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko