Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM/VMX: Use %rax instead of %__ASM_AX within CONFIG_X86_64

From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Wed May 12 2021 - 07:58:49 EST


On 12/05/21 13:21, Uros Bizjak wrote:
There is no need to use %__ASM_AX within CONFIG_X86_64. The macro
will always expand to %rax.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S | 44 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S | 32 +++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
index 4fa17df123cd..844b558bb021 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
@@ -64,14 +64,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__svm_vcpu_run)
mov VCPU_RSI(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_SI
mov VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_DI
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- mov VCPU_R8 (%_ASM_AX), %r8
- mov VCPU_R9 (%_ASM_AX), %r9
- mov VCPU_R10(%_ASM_AX), %r10
- mov VCPU_R11(%_ASM_AX), %r11
- mov VCPU_R12(%_ASM_AX), %r12
- mov VCPU_R13(%_ASM_AX), %r13
- mov VCPU_R14(%_ASM_AX), %r14
- mov VCPU_R15(%_ASM_AX), %r15
+ mov VCPU_R8 (%rax), %r8
+ mov VCPU_R9 (%rax), %r9
+ mov VCPU_R10(%rax), %r10
+ mov VCPU_R11(%rax), %r11
+ mov VCPU_R12(%rax), %r12
+ mov VCPU_R13(%rax), %r13
+ mov VCPU_R14(%rax), %r14
+ mov VCPU_R15(%rax), %r15
#endif
/* "POP" @vmcb to RAX. */
@@ -93,21 +93,21 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__svm_vcpu_run)
pop %_ASM_AX
/* Save all guest registers. */
- mov %_ASM_CX, VCPU_RCX(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %_ASM_DX, VCPU_RDX(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %_ASM_BX, VCPU_RBX(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %_ASM_BP, VCPU_RBP(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %_ASM_SI, VCPU_RSI(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %_ASM_DI, VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_AX)
+ mov %_ASM_CX, VCPU_RCX(%_ASM_AX)
+ mov %_ASM_DX, VCPU_RDX(%_ASM_AX)
+ mov %_ASM_BX, VCPU_RBX(%_ASM_AX)
+ mov %_ASM_BP, VCPU_RBP(%_ASM_AX)
+ mov %_ASM_SI, VCPU_RSI(%_ASM_AX)
+ mov %_ASM_DI, VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_AX)
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- mov %r8, VCPU_R8 (%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r9, VCPU_R9 (%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r10, VCPU_R10(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r11, VCPU_R11(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r12, VCPU_R12(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r13, VCPU_R13(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r14, VCPU_R14(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r15, VCPU_R15(%_ASM_AX)
+ mov %r8, VCPU_R8 (%rax)
+ mov %r9, VCPU_R9 (%rax)
+ mov %r10, VCPU_R10(%rax)
+ mov %r11, VCPU_R11(%rax)
+ mov %r12, VCPU_R12(%rax)
+ mov %r13, VCPU_R13(%rax)
+ mov %r14, VCPU_R14(%rax)
+ mov %r15, VCPU_R15(%rax)
#endif
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
index 3a6461694fc2..9273709e4800 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
@@ -142,14 +142,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vmx_vcpu_run)
mov VCPU_RSI(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_SI
mov VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_DI
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- mov VCPU_R8 (%_ASM_AX), %r8
- mov VCPU_R9 (%_ASM_AX), %r9
- mov VCPU_R10(%_ASM_AX), %r10
- mov VCPU_R11(%_ASM_AX), %r11
- mov VCPU_R12(%_ASM_AX), %r12
- mov VCPU_R13(%_ASM_AX), %r13
- mov VCPU_R14(%_ASM_AX), %r14
- mov VCPU_R15(%_ASM_AX), %r15
+ mov VCPU_R8 (%rax), %r8
+ mov VCPU_R9 (%rax), %r9
+ mov VCPU_R10(%rax), %r10
+ mov VCPU_R11(%rax), %r11
+ mov VCPU_R12(%rax), %r12
+ mov VCPU_R13(%rax), %r13
+ mov VCPU_R14(%rax), %r14
+ mov VCPU_R15(%rax), %r15
#endif
/* Load guest RAX. This kills the @regs pointer! */
mov VCPU_RAX(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_AX
@@ -175,14 +175,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vmx_vcpu_run)
mov %_ASM_SI, VCPU_RSI(%_ASM_AX)
mov %_ASM_DI, VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_AX)
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- mov %r8, VCPU_R8 (%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r9, VCPU_R9 (%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r10, VCPU_R10(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r11, VCPU_R11(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r12, VCPU_R12(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r13, VCPU_R13(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r14, VCPU_R14(%_ASM_AX)
- mov %r15, VCPU_R15(%_ASM_AX)
+ mov %r8, VCPU_R8 (%rax)
+ mov %r9, VCPU_R9 (%rax)
+ mov %r10, VCPU_R10(%rax)
+ mov %r11, VCPU_R11(%rax)
+ mov %r12, VCPU_R12(%rax)
+ mov %r13, VCPU_R13(%rax)
+ mov %r14, VCPU_R14(%rax)
+ mov %r15, VCPU_R15(%rax)
#endif
/* Clear RAX to indicate VM-Exit (as opposed to VM-Fail). */


It looks a bit weird either way (either the address is different within the #ifdef, or the address is different from the destinatino), so I lean more towards avoiding churn.

Paolo