Re: [PATCH] arm64: configs: remove redundant CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP
From: Matthias Brugger
Date: Fri May 14 2021 - 03:42:22 EST
On 11/05/2021 22:04, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Hi Catalin,
> Thanks for cc'ing me.
> On 11/5/21 19:20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:24:10AM +0800, Luo Longjun wrote:
>>> When I compile kernel in ARM64, it produces the following output:
>>> *** Default configuration is based on 'defconfig'
>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:1018:warning: override: reassigning to
>>> symbol MTK_PMIC_WRAP
>>> After checking defcofnig, I found two CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP options.
>>> Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>> index 08c6f769df9a..9907a431db0d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=y
>> Adding Matthias and Enric. This change looks fine to me but I think it
>> should go in via the arm-soc tree. Commit 9fd5449e061e introduced the =m
>> option while commit fbbe38309d56 introduced the =y variant.
>> You could add:
>> Fixes: fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb")
> I sent the same patch some time ago .
> I agree, either land this patch or mine. In any case,
> Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Matthias is this something that should go through your tree?
Yes, this should go through my tree. I'll take care of it.