Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
From: Mark Brown
Date: Fri May 21 2021 - 13:53:27 EST
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:47:13PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
> On 5/21/21 12:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Like I say we may come up with some use for the flag in error cases in
> > future so I'm not opposed to keeping the accounting there.
> So, should I leave it the way it is now? Or should I not set reliable = false
> for errors? Which one do you prefer?
> Are you OK with not flagging reliable = false for errors in unwind_frame()?
I think it's fine to leave it as it is.
Description: PGP signature