Re: [PATCH 2/4] mailbox: imx: replace the xTR/xRR array with single register

[Daniel Baluta]

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 3:33 PM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>
> The xTR/xRR registers are using 4 bytes stride and continuous.
> Considering we will support more TR and RR registers, use base + idx * 4
> method to calculate register address, not hardcoding in driver.
>
Peng, this means that for imx8ul the Tx registers are not continuous
right? Please make this clear in
the commit message.

> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> index 2543c7b6948b..bd7758c32a80 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> @@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ struct imx_mu_dcfg {
>         int (*tx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp, void *data);
>         int (*rx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp);
>         void (*init)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv);
> -       u32     xTR[4];         /* Transmit Registers */
> -       u32     xRR[4];         /* Receive Registers */
> +       u32     xTR;            /* Transmit Register0 */
> +       u32     xRR;            /* Receive Register0 */
>         u32     xSR;            /* Status Register */
>         u32     xCR;            /* Control Register */
>  };
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>
>         switch (cp->type) {
>         case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> -               imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
> +               imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR + cp->idx * 4);
>                 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
>                 break;
>         case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>  {
>         u32 dat;
>
> -       dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
> +       dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (cp->idx) * 4);
>         mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)&dat);
>
>         return 0;
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>                 }
>
>                 for (i = 0; i < 4 && i < msg->hdr.size; i++)
> -                       imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
> +                       imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
>                 for (; i < msg->hdr.size; i++) {
>                         ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR,
>                                                  xsr,
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>                                 dev_err(priv->dev, "Send data index: %d timeout\n", i);
>                                 return ret;
>                         }
> -                       imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
> +                       imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
>                 }
>
>                 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>         u32 xsr;
>
>         imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0));
> -       *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[0]);
> +       *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR);
>
>         if (msg.hdr.size > sizeof(msg) / 4) {
>                 dev_err(priv->dev, "Maximal message size (%zu bytes) exceeded on RX; got: %i bytes\n", sizeof(msg), msg.hdr.size << 2);
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>                         dev_err(priv->dev, "timeout read idx %d\n", i);
>                         return ret;
>                 }
> -               *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[i % 4]);
> +               *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % 4) * 4);
>         }
>
>         imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0), 0);
> @@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
>         .tx     = imx_mu_generic_tx,
>         .rx     = imx_mu_generic_rx,
>         .init   = imx_mu_init_generic,
> -       .xTR    = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> -       .xRR    = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> +       .xTR    = 0x0,
> +       .xRR    = 0x10,
>         .xSR    = 0x20,
>         .xCR    = 0x24,
>  };
> @@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
>         .tx     = imx_mu_generic_tx,
>         .rx     = imx_mu_generic_rx,
>         .init   = imx_mu_init_generic,
> -       .xTR    = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
> -       .xRR    = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
> +       .xTR    = 0x20,
> +       .xRR    = 0x40,
>         .xSR    = 0x60,
>         .xCR    = 0x64,
>  };
> @@ -584,8 +584,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
>         .tx     = imx_mu_scu_tx,
>         .rx     = imx_mu_scu_rx,
>         .init   = imx_mu_init_scu,
> -       .xTR    = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> -       .xRR    = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> +       .xTR    = 0x0
> +       .xRR    = 0x10
>         .xSR    = 0x20,
>         .xCR    = 0x24,
>  };
> --
> 2.30.0
>