Re: [RFC v2-fix-v2 1/1] x86: Introduce generic protected guest abstraction

[Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan]

On 6/2/21 11:19 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> This certainly doesn't capture all of the situations where true would need
> to be returned. For example, SEV, but not SEV-ES, requires that string I/O
> be unrolled, etc.

For AMD following cases should be true right? I can fix it in next version.

case VM_UNROLL_STRING_IO:
case VM_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT:

--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer