Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] cifs: Change cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index to "unsigned long"
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Fri Jun 04 2021 - 07:42:33 EST
Hi Shyam,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:12 PM Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You can find the updated patches in the linux-cifs mailing list about an hour ago.
> Titled: Multichannel patches
The link in the updated PR still points to the old buggy patch.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 4:39 PM
> To: Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] cifs: Change cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index to "unsigned long"
>
> Hi Shyam,
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:41 PM Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thanks for the email.
> > I've already submitted the fix for this. You should see this fixed tomorrow.
>
> Where can I find these submitted fixes?
>
> As per linux-next policy[1], commits in linux-next should be posted to the relevant mailing list first, which is linux-cifs, AFAIK.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1] https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Flinux-next%2F20210430174733.5a31d0c6%40canb.auug.org.au%2F&data=04%7C01%7CShyam.Prasad%40microsoft.com%7C50e24fa9469045cee62208d9274937e2%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637584017711363338%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=WVfbz5WhzyupDUljqSmxlyCdSZtOPcdGxwYpoyqYXqA%3D&reserved=0
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 2:32 PM
> > To: Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxx>; Shyam Prasad
> > <Shyam.Prasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] cifs: Change cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index to "unsigned long"
> >
> > On 32-bit (e.g. m68k):
> >
> > fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: In function 'cifs_reconnect_tcon':
> > ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
> > fs/cifs/cifssmb.c:201:42: note: format string is defined here
> > 201 | cifs_dbg(FYI, "sess reconnect mask: 0x%lx, tcon reconnect: %d",
> > | ~~^
> > | |
> > | long unsigned int
> > | %x
> >
> > fs/cifs/transport.c: In function 'cifs_pick_channel':
> > fs/cifs/cifsglob.h:955:20: error: passing argument 2 of 'test_bit' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > 955 | test_bit((index), &(ses)->chans_need_reconnect)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | |
> > | size_t * {aka unsigned int *}
> > ./arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:151:66: note: expected 'const volatile long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'}
> > 151 | static inline int test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *vaddr)
> > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> >
> > fs/cifs/sess.c: In function 'cifs_chan_set_need_reconnect':
> > fs/cifs/sess.c:98:22: error: passing argument 2 of 'bset_mem_set_bit' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > 98 | set_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | |
> > | size_t * {aka unsigned int *}
> > ./arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:41:69: note: expected 'volatile long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'}
> > 41 | static inline void bset_mem_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *vaddr)
> > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> > fs/cifs/sess.c:98:22: error: passing argument 2 of 'bfset_mem_set_bit' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > 98 | set_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | |
> > | size_t * {aka unsigned int *}
> > ./arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:50:70: note: expected 'volatile long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'}
> > 50 | static inline void bfset_mem_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *vaddr)
> > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > As bitops can only operate on long objects, and
> > cifs_ses_get_chan_index() already returns "unsigned long", fix this by changing cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index from "size_t" to "unsigned long".
> >
> > Fixes: 374c6c7bba3cbaa1 ("cifs: changes to support multichannel during
> > channel reconnect")
> > Reported-by: noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Can you please add Link: headers when committing patches?
> > I could not find this patch in the lore archives of linux-cifs or linux-fsdevel, presumably it was posted elsewhere?
> > Thanks!
> > ---
> > fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 2 +-
> > fs/cifs/sess.c | 6 +++---
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h index
> > 8fea2ddd2bd7af26..a9c026af21e1e9d1 100644
> > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > @@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ struct cifs_ses {
> > * enable the sessions on top to continue to live till any
> > * of the channels below are active.
> > */
> > - size_t chans_need_reconnect;
> > + unsigned long chans_need_reconnect;
> > };
> >
> > static inline bool
> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/sess.c b/fs/cifs/sess.c index
> > 1721a3b246942266..1a17ddd6abbe5778 100644
> > --- a/fs/cifs/sess.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/sess.c
> > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void
> > cifs_chan_set_need_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
> > struct TCP_Server_Info *server) {
> > - size_t chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
> > + unsigned long chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses,
> > + server);
> > set_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
> > cifs_dbg(FYI, "Set reconnect bitmask for chan %lu; now 0x%lx\n",
> > chan_index, ses->chans_need_reconnect); @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void cifs_chan_clear_need_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
> > struct TCP_Server_Info *server) {
> > - size_t chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
> > + unsigned long chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses,
> > + server);
> > clear_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
> > cifs_dbg(FYI, "Cleared reconnect bitmask for chan %lu; now 0x%lx\n",
> > chan_index, ses->chans_need_reconnect); @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ bool cifs_chan_needs_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
> > struct TCP_Server_Info *server) {
> > - size_t chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
> > + unsigned long chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses,
> > + server);
> > return CIFS_CHAN_NEEDS_RECONNECT(ses, chan_index); }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds