Re: [PATCH] [v2] r8169: Use PHY_POLL when RTL8106E enable ASPM

From: Heiner Kallweit
Date: Tue Jun 08 2021 - 17:00:00 EST


On 08.06.2021 16:17, Koba Ko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:45 PM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 08.06.2021 12:43, Koba Ko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:00 PM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08.06.2021 05:22, Koba Ko wrote:
>>>>> For RTL8106E, it's a Fast-ethernet chip.
>>>>> If ASPM is enabled, the link chang interrupt wouldn't be triggered
>>>>> immediately and must wait a very long time to get link change interrupt.
>>>>> Even the link change interrupt isn't triggered, the phy link is already
>>>>> established.
>>>>>
>>>>> Use PHY_POLL to watch the status of phy link and disable
>>>>> the link change interrupt when ASPM is enabled on RTL8106E.
>>>>>
>>>>> v2: Instead use PHY_POLL and identify 8106E by RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still the issue description doesn't convince me that it's a hw bug
>>>> with the respective chip version. What has been stated so far:
>>>>
>>>> 1. (and most important) Issue doesn't occur in mainline because ASPM
>>>> is disabled in mainline for r8169. Issue occurs only with a
>>>> downstream kernel with ASPM enabled for r8169.
>>>
>>> mainline kernel and enable L1, the issue is also observed.
>>>
>> Yes, but enabling L1 via sysfs is at own risk.
>
> but we could have a workaround if hw have an aspm issue.
>
>>
>>>> 2. Issue occurs only with ASPM L1.1 not disabled, even though this chip
>>>> version doesn't support L1 sub-states. Just L0s/L1 don't trigger
>>>> the issue.
>>>> The NIC doesn't announce L1.1 support, therefore PCI core won't
>>>> enable L1 sub-states on the PCIe link between NIC and upstream
>>>> PCI bridge.
>>>
>>> More precisely, when L1 is enabled, the issue would be triggered.
>>> For RTL8106E,
>>> 1. Only disable L0s, pcie_aspm_enabled return 1, issue is triggered.
>>> 2. Only disable L1_1, pcie_aspm_enabled return 1, issue is triggered.
>>>
>>> 3. Only disable L1, pcie_aspm_enabled return 0, issue is not triggered.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 3. Issue occurs only with a GBit-capable link partner. 100MBit link
>>>> partners are fine. Not clear whether issue occurs with a specific
>>>> Gbit link partner only or with GBit-capable link partners in general.
>>>>
>>>> 4. Only link-up interrupt is affected. Not link-down and not interrupts
>>>> triggered by other interrupt sources.
>>>>
>>>> 5. Realtek couldn't confirm that there's such a hw bug on RTL8106e.
>>>>
>>>> One thing that hasn't been asked yet:
>>>> Does issue occur always if you re-plug the cable? Or only on boot?
>>>> I'm asking because in the dmesg log you attached to the bugzilla issue
>>>> the following looks totally ok.
>>>>
>>>> [ 61.651643] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Down
>>>> [ 63.720015] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
>>>> [ 66.685499] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Down
>>>
>>> Once the link is up,
>>> 1. If cable is unplug&plug immediately, you wouldn't see the issue.
>>> 2. Unplug cable and wait a long time (~1Mins), then plug the cable,
>>> the issue appears again.
>>>
>> This sounds runtime-pm-related. After 10s the NIC runtime-suspends,
>> and once the cable is re-plugged a PME is triggered that lets the
>> PCI core return the PCIe link from D3hot to D0.
>> If you re-plug the cable after such a longer time, do you see the
>> PCIe PME immediately in /proc/interrupts?
>
> I don't know which irq number is for RTL8106e PME, but check all PME
> in /proc/interrupt,
>
> There's no interrupt increase on all PME entries and rtl8106e irq entry(irq 32).
>
>>
>> And if you set /sys/class/net/<if>/power/control to "on", does the
>> issue still occur?
>
> Yes, after echo "on" to /sys/class/net/<if>/power/control and
> replugging the cable, the issue is still caught.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Koba Ko <koba.ko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>>> index 2c89cde7da1e..a59cbaef2839 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>>> @@ -4914,6 +4914,19 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rtl8169_pm_ops = {
>>>>>
>>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
>>>>>
>>>>> +static int rtl_phy_poll_quirk(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = tp->pci_dev;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!pcie_aspm_enabled(pdev))
>>>>
>>>> That's the wrong call. According to what you said earlier you want to
>>>> check for L1 sub-states, not for ASPM in general.
>>>
>>> As per described above, that's why use pcie_aspm_enabled here.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (tp->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39)
>>>>> + return 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> static void rtl_wol_shutdown_quirk(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>>>>> {
>>>>> /* WoL fails with 8168b when the receiver is disabled. */
>>>>> @@ -4991,7 +5004,10 @@ static const struct net_device_ops rtl_netdev_ops = {
>>>>>
>>>>> static void rtl_set_irq_mask(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - tp->irq_mask = RxOK | RxErr | TxOK | TxErr | LinkChg;
>>>>> + tp->irq_mask = RxOK | RxErr | TxOK | TxErr;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!rtl_phy_poll_quirk(tp))
>>>>> + tp->irq_mask |= LinkChg;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (tp->mac_version <= RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_06)
>>>>> tp->irq_mask |= SYSErr | RxOverflow | RxFIFOOver;
>>>>> @@ -5085,7 +5101,8 @@ static int r8169_mdio_register(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>>>>> new_bus->name = "r8169";
>>>>> new_bus->priv = tp;
>>>>> new_bus->parent = &pdev->dev;
>>>>> - new_bus->irq[0] = PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT;
>>>>> + new_bus->irq[0] =
>>>>> + (rtl_phy_poll_quirk(tp) ? PHY_POLL : PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT);
>>>>> snprintf(new_bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "r8169-%x", pci_dev_id(pdev));
>>>>>
>>>>> new_bus->read = r8169_mdio_read_reg;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

The r8101 vendor driver applies a special setting for RTL8106e if ASPM is enabled.
Not sure whether it's related but it's worth a try. Could you please check whether
the following makes a difference?

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c
index 50f0f621b..60014b9c4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c
@@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ static void rtl8106e_hw_phy_config(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
r8169_apply_firmware(tp);

rtl_writephy_batch(phydev, phy_reg_init);
+ phy_write(phydev, 0x18, 0x8310);
}

static void rtl8125_legacy_force_mode(struct phy_device *phydev)
--
2.32.0