Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 09/22] x86/compressed: Register GHCB memory when SEV-SNP is active

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Wed Jun 09 2021 - 13:47:08 EST


On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 09:04:03AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
> index 1424b8ffde0b..ae99a8a756fe 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,17 @@
> #define GHCB_MSR_PSC_ERROR_POS 32
> #define GHCB_MSR_PSC_RESP_VAL(val) ((val) >> GHCB_MSR_PSC_ERROR_POS)
>
> +/* GHCB GPA Register */
> +#define GHCB_MSR_GPA_REG_REQ 0x012
> +#define GHCB_MSR_GPA_REG_VALUE_POS 12
> +#define GHCB_MSR_GPA_REG_GFN_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 0)
> +#define GHCB_MSR_GPA_REQ_GFN_VAL(v) \
> + (((unsigned long)((v) & GHCB_MSR_GPA_REG_GFN_MASK) << GHCB_MSR_GPA_REG_VALUE_POS)| \
> + GHCB_MSR_GPA_REG_REQ)
> +
> +#define GHCB_MSR_GPA_REG_RESP 0x013
> +#define GHCB_MSR_GPA_REG_RESP_VAL(v) ((v) >> GHCB_MSR_GPA_REG_VALUE_POS)
> +

Can we pls pay attention to having those REQuests sorted by their
number, like in the GHCB spec, for faster finding?

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette